Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655503›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Scoring System for English Essays under the Background of Modern Information Technology.

Shaoyun Fu, Hongfu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaoyun FuMinjiang University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-3217
Hongfu ChenMinjiang University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work is to reduce the workload of teachers in English teaching and improve the writing level of students, so as to provide a way for students to practice English composition scoring independently and satisfy the needs of college teachers and students for intelligent English composition scoring and intelligently generated comments. In this work, it firstly clarifies the teaching requirements of college English classrooms and expounds the principles and advantages of machine learning technology. Secondly, a three-layer neural network model (NNM) is constructed by using the multilayer perceptron (MLP), combined with the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) algorithm. Furthermore, three semantic representation vector technologies, including word vector, paragraph vector, and full-text vector feature, are used to represent the full-text vocabulary of English composition. Then, a model based on the K-nearest neighbors (kNN) algorithm is proposed to generate English composition evaluation, and a final score based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model is proposed. Finally, a model dataset is constructed using 800 college students' English essays for the CET-4 mock test, and the model is tested. The research results show that the semantic representation vector technology proposed can more effectively extract the lexical semantic features of English compositions. The XGBoost model and the kNN algorithm model are used to score and evaluate English compositions, which improves the accuracy of the scores. This makes the management of the entire scoring model more efficient and more accurate. It means that the model proposed is better than the traditional model in terms of evaluation accuracy. This work provides a new direction for the application of artificial intelligence technology in English teaching under the background of modern information technology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceInformation TechnologyAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35655503
PMCPMC9152396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.