Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655262›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Experiment in semi-natural conditions did not confirm the influence of malaria infection on bird attractiveness to mosquitoes.

Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo, Romain Pigeault, Julie Isaïa, Jérôme Wassef, Molly Baur, Olivier Glaizot, Philippe Christe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille-Sophie CozzaroloDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland. camille-sophie.cozzarolo@ik.me.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-8622
Romain PigeaultDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-4600
Julie IsaïaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Jérôme WassefDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Molly BaurDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Olivier Glaizot *Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-3355
Philippe Christe *Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-7002
University of Lausanne · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMusée cantonal de zoologie de Lausanne · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_179378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in host phenotype following parasite infection are often considered as host manipulation when they seem advantageous for the parasite. However, putative cases of host manipulation by parasites are rarely tested in field-realistic conditions. Infection-induced phenotypic change cannot be conclusively considered as host manipulation if no evidence shows that this trait is adaptive for the parasite in the wild. Plasmodium sp., the parasites causing malaria in vertebrates, are hypothesized to "manipulate" their host by making their odour more attractive to mosquitoes, their vector and final host. While this is fairly well supported by studies on mice and humans, studies focusing on avian malaria give contradictory results.

methodsIn the present study, genotyped birds at different stages (uninfected, acute and chronic) of Plasmodium relictum infection were exposed, in a large outdoor aviary, to their natural vector, the mosquito Culex pipiens.

resultsAfter genotyping the blood meals of more than 650 mosquitoes, we found that mosquitoes did not bite infected birds more than they bit them before infection, nor more than they bit uninfected hosts.

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of testing ecological behaviours under natural conditions and suggests that different processes might be at play in mammals and birds regarding potential manipulation of attractiveness by malaria parasites.

Indexed as

BirdsBites and StingsCulicidaeMalaria, AvianAnimalsMosquito VectorsAttractionCulex pipiensExposureExtended phenotypeManipulationParasitePlasmodiumVector

Identifiers

PMID35655262
PMCPMC9164852
OpenAlexW4281684015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.