Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655234›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study.

Clementina Duran Palma, Musawenkosi Mamba, Johan Geldenhuys, Oluwafolajimi Fadahun, Rolf Rossaint, Kai Zacharowski, Martin Brand, Óscar Díaz-Cambronero, Javier Belda, Martin Westphal and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03338218 (Pragmatic, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03338218 phase4completednot on this map

Pragmatic, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFresenius KabiRan2019 to 2022Enrolled238ConditionsHypovolemia Due to Acute Blood LossArmsVolulyte 6%, Ionolyte
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of Selected Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions on Coagulation Status Evaluated by Rotational Thromboelastometry and Platelet Function Analyser: An in vitro Study.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Clementina Duran PalmaTrident Clinical Homestead Medical Center, Kimberley, South Africa.
Musawenkosi MambaGama Research Center, Soshanguve, Gauteng, South Africa.
Johan GeldenhuysFCRN Clinical Trials Centre, Vereeniging, South Africa.
Oluwafolajimi FadahunGama Research Centre, Leratong Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rolf RossaintRWTH University Hospital, Rhineland-Westfalen Technical University, Aachen, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiFrankfurt University Hospital, Johannes Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin BrandSteve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Óscar Díaz-CambroneroUniversitari i Politècnic La Fe Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Javier BeldaHospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Martin WestphalFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Ute BrauerB. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Dirk DormannFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Tamara DehnhardtB. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Martin Hernandez-GonzalezFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Sonja SchmierB. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Dianne de KorteDivision of Acute and Critical Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Frank PlaniChris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto, South Africa.
Wolfgang BuhreDivision of Acute and Critical Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. wolfgang.buhre@mumc.nl.
B. Braun (Germany) · DEFresenius (Germany) · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLChris Hani Baragwanath Hospital · ZAGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESJohannesburg Hospital · ZASteve Biko Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma may be associated with significant to life-threatening blood loss, which in turn may increase the risk of complications and death, particularly in the absence of adequate treatment. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss to maintain or re-establish hemodynamic stability with the ultimate goal to avoid organ hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse. The current study compares a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) for volume replacement therapy in adult patients with traumatic injuries, as requested by the European Medicines Agency to gain more insights into the safety and efficacy of HES in the setting of trauma care.

methodsTETHYS is a pragmatic, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter, multinational trial performed in two parallel groups. Eligible consenting adults ≥ 18 years, with an estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml, and in whom initial surgery is deemed necessary within 24 h after blunt or penetrating trauma, will be randomized to receive intravenous treatment at an individualized dose with either a 6% HES 130, or an electrolyte solution, for a maximum of 24 h or until reaching the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight, whatever occurs first. Sample size is estimated as 175 patients per group, 350 patients total (α = 0.025 one-tailed, power 1-β = 0.8). Composite primary endpoint evaluated in an exploratory manner will be 90-day mortality and 90-day renal failure, defined as AKIN stage ≥ 2, RIFLE injury/failure stage, or use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the first 3 months. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints are fluid administration and balance, changes in vital signs and hemodynamic status, changes in laboratory parameters including renal function, coagulation, and inflammation biomarkers, incidence of adverse events during treatment period, hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, fitness for ICU or hospital discharge, and duration of mechanical ventilation and/or RRT. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic study will increase the evidence on safety and efficacy of 6% HES 130 for treatment of hypovolemia secondary to acute blood loss in trauma patients.

trial registrationRegistered in EudraCT, No.: 2016-002176-27 (21 April 2017) and ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03338218 (09 November 2017).

Indexed as

ElectrolytesHypovolemiaAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStarchElectrolytesStarchAcute kidney injuryBlood lossColloidsHESHydroxyethyl starchTraumaVolume therapy

Identifiers

PMID35655234
PMCPMC9164328
OpenAlexW4281703514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.