Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655224›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022

Comparative incidence of early and late bloodstream and respiratory tract co-infection in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia versus Influenza A or B pneumonia versus no viral pneumonia: wales multicentre ICU cohort study.

Manish Pandey, Alexander May, Laura Tan, Harriet Hughes, Jack Parry Jones, Wendy Harrison, Scott Bradburn, Sam Tyrrel, Babu Muthuswamy, Nidhika Berry and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. NasalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Manish PandeyAdult Critical Care Directorate, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. manish.pandey@wales.nhs.uk.
Alexander MayDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Laura TanAdult Critical Care Directorate, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Harriet HughesDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Jack Parry JonesAdult Critical Care Directorate, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Wendy HarrisonSenior Scientist, Healthcare Associated Infection, Antimicrobial Resistance & Prescribing Programme (HARP), Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Scott BradburnAdult Critical Care Directorate, Swansea Bay Health Board, Swansea, UK.
Sam TyrrelAdult Critical Care Directorate, Swansea Bay Health Board, Swansea, UK.
Babu MuthuswamyDepartment of Critical Care, Grange University Hospital, Cwmbran, UK.
Nidhika BerryDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.
Richard PughDepartment of Anaesthesia, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, UK.
Daryn SuttonAdvanced Epidemiological Scientist, Healthcare Associated Infection, Antimicrobial Resistance & Prescribing Programme (HARP), Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Andy CampbellAdult Critical Care Directorate, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK.
Matthew MorganAdult Critical Care Directorate, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
University Hospital of Wales · GBPublic Health Wales · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GBGlan Clwyd Hospital · GBLlanfrechfa Grange Hospital · GBRoyal Gwent Hospital · GBWrexham Maelor Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim is to characterise early and late respiratory and bloodstream co-infection in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with SARS-CoV-2-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) needing respiratory support in seven ICUs within Wales, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We compare the rate of positivity of different secondary pathogens and their antimicrobial sensitivity in three different patient groups: patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia, Influenza A or B pneumonia, and patients without viral pneumonia.

designMulticentre, retrospective, observational cohort study with rapid microbiology data from Public Health Wales, sharing of clinical and demographic data from seven participating ICUs.

settingSeven Welsh ICUs participated between 10 March and 31 July 2020. Clinical and demographic data for COVID-19 disease were shared by each participating centres, and microbiology data were extracted from a data repository within Public Health Wales. Comparative data were taken from a cohort of patients without viral pneumonia admitted to ICU during the same period as the COVID-19 cohort (referred to as no viral pneumonia or 'no viral' group), and to a retrospective non-matched cohort of consecutive patients with Influenza A or B admitted to ICUs from 20 November 2017. The comparative data for Influenza pneumonia and no viral pneumonia were taken from one of the seven participating ICUs.

participantsA total of 299 consecutive patients admitted to ICUs with COVID-19 pneumonia were compared with 173 and 48 patients admitted with no viral pneumonia or Influenza A or B pneumonia, respectively.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was to calculate comparative incidence of early and late co-infection in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19, Influenza A or B pneumonia and no viral pneumonia. Secondary outcome was to calculate the individual group of early and late co-infection rate on a per-patient and per-sample basis, with their antimicrobial susceptibility and thirdly to ascertain any statistical correlation between clinical and demographic variables with rate of acquiring co-infection following ICU admission.

resultsA total of 299 adults (median age 57, M/F 2:1) were included in the COVID-19 ICU cohort. The incidence of respiratory and bloodstream co-infection was 40.5% and 15.1%, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant bacterial pathogen within the first 48 h. Gram-negative organisms from Enterobacterales group were predominantly seen after 48 h in COVID-19 cohort. Comparative no viral pneumonia cohort had lower rates of respiratory tract infection and bloodstream infection. The influenza cohort had similar rates respiratory tract infection and bloodstream infection. Mortality in all three groups was similar, and no clinical or demographic variables were found to increase the rate of co-infection and ICU mortality.

conclusionsHigher incidence of bacterial co-infection was found in COVID-19 cohort as compared to the no viral pneumonia cohort admitted to ICUs for respiratory support.

Indexed as

CoinfectionCOVID-19Influenza, HumanPneumonia, ViralRespiratory Tract InfectionsSepsisAdultCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2WalesAntibiotic sensitivityAspergillusCo-infectionCOVID-19EarlyInfluenza A and BLateSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35655224
PMCPMC9160852
OpenAlexW4281632792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.