Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655178›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Usefulness of the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) tool in detecting differences before and after an ergonomics intervention.

Fernanda Cabegi de Barros, Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi, Thaís Cristina Chaves, David M Andrews, Michael Sonne, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Workstation Risk Factors for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among IT Professionals in Indonesia.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernanda Cabegi de BarrosPhysical Therapy Department, Laboratory of Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics (LAFIPE), Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil.
Cristiane Shinohara MoriguchiPhysical Therapy Department, Laboratory of Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics (LAFIPE), Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil.
Thaís Cristina ChavesPhysical Therapy Department, Laboratory of Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics (LAFIPE), Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil.
David M AndrewsDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Michael SonneOccupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers Inc, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Tatiana de Oliveira SatoPhysical Therapy Department, Laboratory of Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics (LAFIPE), Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil. tatisato@gmail.com.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 131466/2015-1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost ergonomics studies on office workstations evaluate the effects of an intervention only by subjective measures such as musculoskeletal pain and discomfort. Limited evidence has been provided regarding risk factor reduction in office environments through standardized methods assessments. The Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) tool can provide an estimation of risk factor exposure for office workers as a means by which the outcome of interventions can be quantified. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate if ROSA scores reflect changes in risk factors after an ergonomics intervention among office workers.

methodsOffice workers (n = 60) were divided into two groups. The experimental group received a workstation intervention and the control group received no intervention. Changes in ROSA scores were compared before and after the intervention in both groups.

resultsStatistically significant reductions in the ROSA final and section scores occurred after the intervention in the experimental group with (mean reduction of 2.9, 0.8 and 1.6 points for sections A, B and C, respectively). In contrast, no differences were detected in the control group (mean increase of 0.1 point for sections A and C and mean reduction of 0.1 point for Section B).

conclusionsThese findings show that ROSA scores reflect changes in risk factors after an ergonomics intervention in an office environment. Consequently, this tool can be used for identifying and controlling risk factors among computer workers, before and after interventions.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainOccupational DiseasesComputersErgonomicsHumansMusculoskeletal discomfortOccupational healthPrevention & control

Identifiers

PMID35655178
PMCPMC9160176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.