Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655163›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Refractive changes and visual quality in patients with corneal edema after cataract surgery.

Mª Amparo Díez-Ajenjo, Mª José Luque-Cobija, Cristina Peris-Martínez, Susana Ortí-Navarro, Mª Carmen García-Domene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Machine learning for risk stratification of postoperative corneal edema in East Asian cataract patients: a model for precision ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Corneal Edema after Cataract Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mª Amparo Díez-AjenjoFISABIO Oftalmología Médica (FOM), Bifurcación Pío Baroja-General Avilés, s/n. E46015, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-4039
Mª José Luque-CobijaFISABIO Oftalmología Médica (FOM), Bifurcación Pío Baroja-General Avilés, s/n. E46015, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5918-8429
Cristina Peris-MartínezFISABIO Oftalmología Médica (FOM), Bifurcación Pío Baroja-General Avilés, s/n. E46015, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5992-5006
Susana Ortí-NavarroOptics, Optometry and Visual Sciences Department, Physics Faculty, University of Valencia, Av Dr. Moliner, 50, E 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain. susana.orti@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2698-7849
Mª Carmen García-DomeneFISABIO Oftalmología Médica (FOM), Bifurcación Pío Baroja-General Avilés, s/n. E46015, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-0214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess visual quality and stabilization of refractive changes in corneal edema patients after cataract surgery, using visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity measurements.

methodsSixty-one eyes were analysed, twenty-three with and thirty-eight without corneal edema. Uncorrected and corrected distance VA (UDVA and CDVA) were determined with an EDTRS chart, the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) under photopic and mesopic illumination conditions with a CVS-1000e chart, clinical refraction, and corneal topography. Measurements were taken preoperatively, 1-2 days, 1 and 3-months after surgery. Clinical refraction was converted to vector notation (M, J

resultsAn improvement of VA was observed through the postoperative period; changes between visits were significant for CDVA in both groups and for UDVA in the edema sample. Significant astigmatic changes (J

conclusionCorneal edema patients had a significant reduction of CDVA, and frequency-selective sensitivity losses that evidence a visual quality loss. Clinical refraction may improve visual quality, but in edema patients these losses are related to corneal changes, which did not change at three months after surgery.

Indexed as

CataractCorneal EdemaCorneaEdemaHumansRefraction, OcularCataract surgeryClinical refractionContrast sensitivity functionCorneal edemaVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35655163
PMCPMC9164413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.