ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022
Education differences in cardiometabolic risk in England, Scotland and the United States between 1992 and 2019.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of noise-induced hearing loss based on frequency analysis and its association with metabolic syndrome: a case study in a petrochemical industry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between weekend warriors and MASLD-a cross-sectional study of the NHANES database 2017-2020.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Midlife diseases of despair and cardiometabolic risk: testing shared origins in adolescent psychopathology.Psychological medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Polyphenols and Cardiometabolic Health: Knowledge and Concern among Romanian People.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Evaluating the association between the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet, mental health, and cardio-metabolic risk factors among individuals with obesity.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEducation differences in cardiometabolic risk and disease still play a major role in the magnitude of the socioeconomic health disparities in high-income societies. However, the knowledge on how education differences may have changed over time regarding the distribution of multiple risk factors is rather limited. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of those differences in three high-income countries.
methodsData from repeated cross-sectional population health and examination surveys conducted between 1992 and 2019 in England, Scotland and the United States are analysed (pooled sample size [Formula: see text]). Six cardiometabolic risk factors, namely, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body-mass-index, glycated haemoglobin HbA1c, serum total cholesterol and the cardiovascular risk score are analysed with linear mixed models.
resultsEducation differences in cardiometabolic risk were found to have either increased or remained stable for the past 3 decades in the countries included in the analyses. Among individuals with no qualification the cardiometabolic risk has been higher than among the higher educated (mean difference: 0.136, 99% CI [0.119; 0.152]). Education differences were observed also for systolic blood pressure (2.788 mmHg, 99% CI [2.529; 3.047]), glycated haemoglobin HbA1c (0.160 %, 99% CI [0.136; 0.185]), total cholesterol (0.268 mmol/L, 99% CI [0.247; 0.289]) and body-mass-index (0.591 kg/m
conclusionThe results suggest a more complex pattern of associations between education and health which may be due to education-dependent processes related to behavioural, cognitive and attitudinal modification and adaptation to changing socio-cultural conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.