Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654971›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effect of simultaneous testing of two mice in the tail suspension test and forced swim test.

Hiroshi Ueno, Yu Takahashi, Shinji Murakami, Kenta Wani, Yosuke Matsumoto, Motoi Okamoto, Takeshi Ishihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Apigenin Regulating PI3K/AKT Pathway to Improve Depressive Behavior in Epileptic Rats.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-specific relationships between stress coping and avoidance behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiroshi UenoDepartment of Medical Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, 288, Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan. dhe422007@s.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Yu TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, 701-0192, Japan.
Shinji MurakamiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, 701-0192, Japan.
Kenta WaniDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, 701-0192, Japan.
Yosuke MatsumotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Motoi OkamotoDepartment of Medical Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Takeshi IshiharaDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, 701-0192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mouse studies, the results of behavioural experiments are greatly affected by differences in the experimental environment and handling methods. The Porsolt forced swim test and tail suspension test are widely used to evaluate predictive models of depression-like behaviour in mice. It has not been clarified how the results of these tests are affected by testing single or multiple mice simultaneously. Therefore, this study evaluated the differences between testing two mice simultaneously or separately. To investigate the effect of testing multiple mice simultaneously, the Porsolt forced swim test and tail suspension test were performed in three patterns: (1) testing with an opaque partition between two mice, (2) testing without a partition between two mice, and (3) testing a single mouse. In the Porsolt forced swim test, the mice tested simultaneously without a partition demonstrated increased immobility time as compared to mice tested alone. No difference in immobility time was observed between the three groups in the tail suspension test. Our results showed that the environment of behavioural experiments investigating depression-like behaviour in mice can cause a difference in depression-like behaviour. The results of this experiment indicated that it is necessary to describe the method used for behavioural testing in detail.

Indexed as

Hindlimb SuspensionSwimmingAnimalsMice

Identifiers

PMID35654971
PMCPMC9163059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.