Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654940›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Post-vaccination outcomes in association with four COVID-19 vaccines in the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Manaf AlQahtani, Xing Du, Sujoy Bhattacharyya, Abdulla Alawadi, Hamad Al Mahmeed, Jaleela Al Sayed, Jessica Justman, Wafaa M El-Sadr, Jack Hidary, Siddhartha Mukherjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manaf AlQahtaniBahrain Defense Force Hospital, National Task Force for Combating COVID-19, Riffa, Bahrain.
Xing DuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Sujoy BhattacharyyaSchool of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Abdulla AlawadiBahrain Defense Force Hospital, National Task Force for Combating COVID-19, Riffa, Bahrain.
Hamad Al MahmeedBahrain Defense Force Hospital, National Task Force for Combating COVID-19, Riffa, Bahrain.
Jaleela Al SayedBahrain Defense Force Hospital, National Task Force for Combating COVID-19, Riffa, Bahrain.
Jessica JustmanMailman School of Public Health, ICAP at Columbia University, New York, USA.
Wafaa M El-SadrMailman School of Public Health, ICAP at Columbia University, New York, USA.
Jack HidarySandbox@Alphabet, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Siddhartha MukherjeeSchool of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, USA. smukherj2000@gmail.com.
Bahrain Center for Strategic International and Energy Studies · BHColumbia University · USICAP Global HealthInitial Teaching Alphabet Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of new SARS-Cov2 variants, critical questions have arisen about: (1) the effectiveness of the available COVID-19 vaccines developed to protect against the original Wuhan (wild type) variant and (2) the magnitude and clinical consequences of post-vaccination infections in the context of the Delta variant of SARS-Cov2. While some "real world" experiences with various vaccines have been reported, to our knowledge, few have examined comparative outcomes of various vaccines in one country as new SARS-CoV-2 variants have emerged. Here we present an analysis of COVID-19 related outcomes from a national database in Bahrain, a country with a total population of 1.51 million, where four vaccines were deployed (total vaccinated = 1,003,960 adults): AstraZeneca (AZ/Covishield), Pfizer/BioNtech, Sinopharm and Sputnik V. We compare the four vaccines, based on the following post-vaccination outcomes: SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths, compared to unvaccinated individuals. We conclude that the four vaccines used in Bahrain were effective in significantly reducing all four COVID-19 related outcomes compared to unvaccinated individuals, prior to, and during the period when the Delta variant predominated in the country. However, compared to the three other vaccines, individuals vaccinated with Sinopharm vaccine had a higher risk of post-vaccination infections, hospitalisations and ICU admissions (e.g., 6.94%, 2.24%, 1.99% and 1.52% of COVID-19 cases of Sinopharm, Sputnik V, Pfizer and Covishield recipients, respectively, required hospitalisation versus 13.66% of COVID-19 cases among unvaccinated individuals); however, given the confounding factors, this needs to be confirmed by further studies. We find no evidence of biased selection for any vaccine, but note waning protection of the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine during the January to June 2021 period in the age > 60 y cohort; however, this cannot be distinguished from the overall fall in hospitalisations overall. Our findings support the value of vaccination in preventing COVID-19 related outcomes, provide real world estimates on the outcomes and frequencies of post-vaccination infections for the four vaccines, which may inform vaccine selection in the context of the Delta variant across the globe.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesAdultBahrainChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2VaccinationChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35654940
PMCPMC9161761
OpenAlexW4281703308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.