Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Towards fully automated segmentation of rat cardiac MRI by leveraging deep learning frameworks.

Daniel Fernández-Llaneza, Andrea Gondová, Harris Vince, Arijit Patra, Magdalena Zurek, Peter Konings, Patrik Kagelid, Leif Hultin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  3. Open-source pre-clinical image segmentation: mouse cardiac magnetic resonance imaging datasets with a deep learning segmentation framework.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Fernández-Llaneza *Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden. daniel.fernandez1@astrazeneca.com.
Andrea Gondová *Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Harris VinceClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Arijit PatraClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Magdalena ZurekClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Peter KoningsData Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Patrik KagelidClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
Leif HultinClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, SE, Sweden.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated segmentation of human cardiac magnetic resonance datasets has been steadily improving during recent years. Similar applications would be highly useful to improve and speed up the studies of cardiac function in rodents in the preclinical context. However, the transfer of such segmentation methods to the preclinical research is compounded by the limited number of datasets and lower image resolution. In this paper we present a successful application of deep architectures 3D cardiac segmentation for rats in preclinical contexts which to our knowledge has not yet been reported. We developed segmentation models that expand on the standard U-Net architecture and evaluated models separately trained for systole and diastole phases (2MSA) and a single model trained for all phases (1MSA). Furthermore, we calibrated model outputs using a Gaussian process (GP)-based prior to improve phase selection. The resulting models approach human performance in terms of left ventricular segmentation quality and ejection fraction (EF) estimation in both 1MSA and 2MSA settings (Sørensen-Dice score 0.91 ± 0.072 and 0.93 ± 0.032, respectively). 2MSA achieved a mean absolute difference between estimated and reference EF of 3.5 ± 2.5%, while 1MSA resulted in 4.1 ± 3.0%. Applying GPs to 1MSA enabled automating systole and diastole phase selection. Both segmentation approaches (1MSA and 2MSA) were statistically equivalent. Combined with a proposed cardiac phase selection strategy, our work presents an important first step towards a fully automated segmentation pipeline in the context of rat cardiac analysis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsHeartHeart VentriclesMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyRats

Identifiers

PMID35654902
PMCPMC9163082
OpenAlexW3198704324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.