Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654855›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Osteoporosis identification among previously undiagnosed individuals with vertebral fractures.

L S Gold, R F Cody, W K Tan, Z A Marcum, E N Meier, K J Sherman, K T James, B Griffith, A L Avins, D F Kallmes and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in community-dwelling European older adults: an observational analysis of the DO-HEALTH trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

L S GoldDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359558, Seattle, WA, 98195-9558, USA. goldl@uw.edu.
R F CodyDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359558, Seattle, WA, 98195-9558, USA.
W K TanClinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Z A MarcumDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
E N MeierDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
K J ShermanKaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
K T JamesDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359558, Seattle, WA, 98195-9558, USA.
B GriffithDepartment of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
A L AvinsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
D F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
P SuriClinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J L FriedlyClinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
P J HeagertyClinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
R A DeyoDepartments of Family Medicine and Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
P H LuetmerDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S D RundellClinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
D R HaynorDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359558, Seattle, WA, 98195-9558, USA.
J G JarvikDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359558, Seattle, WA, 98195-9558, USA.
University of Washington · USKaiser Permanente · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USHenry Ford Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
UW Core Center for Clinical Research of Musculoskeletal ConditionsP30AR072572 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JEFFREY G JARVIK, Pradeep Suri · 2017 to 2026
$8.3M
A Pragmatic Trial of Lumbar Image Reporting with Epidemiology (LIRE)UH3AR066795 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JARVIK, JEFFREY G · 2014 to 2017
$6.0M
A Pragmatic Trial of Lumbar Image Reporting with Epidemiology (LIRE)UH2AT007766 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JARVIK, JEFFREY G · 2012 to 2012
$838k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT007766NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072572NIAMS NIH HHS U24AT009676NIAMS NIH HHS UH3 AR066795NIH HHS P30AR072572NIH HHS UH2AT007766NIH HHS UH3AR066795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because osteoporosis is under-recognized in patients with vertebral fractures, we evaluated characteristics associated with osteoporosis identification. Most patients with vertebral fractures did not receive evaluation or treatment for osteoporosis. Black, younger, and male participants were particularly unlikely to have had recognized osteoporosis, which could increase their risk of negative outcomes.

introductionVertebral fractures may be identified on imaging but fail to prompt evaluation for osteoporosis. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics associated with clinical osteoporosis recognition in patients who had vertebral fractures detected on their thoracolumbar spine imaging reports.

methodsWe prospectively identified individuals who received imaging of the lower spine at primary care clinics in 4 large healthcare systems who were eligible for osteoporosis screening and lacked indications of osteoporosis diagnoses or treatments in the prior year. We evaluated characteristics of participants with identified vertebral fractures that were associated with recognition of osteoporosis (diagnosis code in the health record; receipt of bone mineral density scans; and/or prescriptions for anti-osteoporotic medications). We used mixed models to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

resultsA total of 114,005 participants (47% female; mean age 65 (interquartile range: 57-72) years) were evaluated. Of the 8579 (7%) participants with vertebral fractures identified, 3784 (44%) had recognition of osteoporosis within the subsequent year. In adjusted regressions, Black participants (OR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.57, 0.97)), younger participants (age 50-60: 0.48 (0.42, 0.54); age 61-64: 0.70 (0.60, 0.81)), and males (0.39 (0.35, 0.43)) were less likely to have recognized osteoporosis compared to white participants, adults aged 65 + years, or females.

conclusionIndividuals with identified vertebral fractures commonly did not have recognition of osteoporosis within a year, particularly those who were younger, Black, or male. Providers and healthcare systems should consider efforts to improve evaluation of osteoporosis in patients with vertebral fractures.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesAdultAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningAgeGenderOsteoporosisraceThoracolumbar imagingVertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID35654855
PMCPMC10120403
OpenAlexW4281983408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.