Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654833›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2023

Sedation for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Moschino, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Irwin Karl Marcel Reiss, Eugenio Baraldi, Charles Christoph Roehr, Sinno Henricus Paulus Simons

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Outcomes, safety and health economics of introduction of video laryngoscopy-assisted less invasive surfactant administration.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura MoschinoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry RamaswamyDepartment of Neonatology, Ankura Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Irwin Karl Marcel ReissDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eugenio BaraldiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Charles Christoph RoehrNewborn Services, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol Trust, Bristol, UK. charles.roehr@npeu.ox.ac.uk.
Sinno Henricus Paulus SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Padua · ITSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedation to preterm neonates receiving less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome is controversial.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS) to evaluate the effect of sedative drugs for LISA on respiratory outcomes and adverse effects.

resultsOne RCT (78 neonates) and two OS (519 neonates) were analyzed in pairwise meta-analysis and 30 studies (2164 neonates) in proportion-based meta-analysis. Sedative drugs might not affect the duration of the procedure [RCT: mean difference (MD) (95% CI); -11 (-90; 67) s; OS: MD 95% CI: -60 (-178; 58) s; low certainty of evidence (CoE)]. Evidence for success at the first attempt and rescue intubation was uncertain (very low CoE). The risk of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation [RCT: 1.97 (1.38-2.81); OS: RR, 95% CI: 2.96 (1.46; 6.00), low CoE], desaturation [RCT: RR, 95% CI: 1.30 (1.03; 1.65), low CoE], and apnea [OS: RR, 95% CI: 3.13 (1.35; 7.24), very low CoE] might be increased with sedation. Bradycardia, hypotension, and mechanical ventilation were comparable between groups (low CoE).

conclusionsUse of sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affects the newborn's breathing. Further trials are warranted to explore the use of sedation for LISA. IMPACT: The effect of sedative drugs (analgesics, sedatives, anesthetics) compared to the effect of no-sedation for LISA in preterm infants with RDS is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of sedative drugs compared to no-sedation for LISA on short-term pulmonary outcomes and potential adverse events. Sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affect the newborn's breathing (desaturation, apnea) and increase the need for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. For most outcomes, certainty of evidence is low/very low.

Indexed as

Pulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornApneaHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureSurface-Active AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPulmonary SurfactantsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID35654833
OpenAlexW4282032333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.