Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654830›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Harnessing solar power: photoautotrophy supplements the diet of a low-light dwelling sponge.

Meggie Hudspith, Jasper M de Goeij, Mischa Streekstra, Niklas A Kornder, Jeremy Bougoure, Paul Guagliardo, Sara Campana, Nicole N van der Wel, Gerard Muyzer, Laura Rix

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Meggie Hudspith *Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.r.hudspith@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-8338
Jasper M de Goeij *Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-3084
Mischa StreekstraDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-1450
Niklas A KornderDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-6078
Jeremy BougoureCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Paul GuagliardoCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-6754
Sara CampanaDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-0426
Nicole N van der WelElectron Microscopy Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gerard MuyzerDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2422-0732
Laura RixThe University of Queensland, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
University of Amsterdam · NLThe University of Western Australia · AUAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCaribbean Research and Management of Biodiversity Foundation · CWThe University of Queensland · AUWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 715513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of organisms to combine autotrophy and heterotrophy gives rise to one of the most successful nutritional strategies on Earth: mixotrophy. Sponges are integral members of shallow-water ecosystems and many host photosynthetic symbionts, but studies on mixotrophic sponges have focused primarily on species residing in high-light environments. Here, we quantify the contribution of photoautotrophy to the respiratory demand and total carbon diet of the sponge Chondrilla caribensis, which hosts symbiotic cyanobacteria and lives in low-light environments. Although the sponge is net heterotrophic at 20 m water depth, photosynthetically fixed carbon potentially provides up to 52% of the holobiont's respiratory demand. When considering the total mixotrophic diet, photoautotrophy contributed an estimated 7% to total daily carbon uptake. Visualization of inorganic

Indexed as

PoriferaSolar EnergyAnimalsCarbonDietEcosystemWaterCarbonWater

Identifiers

PMID35654830
PMCPMC9381825
OpenAlexW4281669671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.