Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654752›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

Intratumoral Resolution of Driver Gene Mutation Heterogeneity in Renal Cancer Using Deep Learning.

Paul H Acosta, Vandana Panwar, Vipul Jarmale, Alana Christie, Jay Jasti, Vitaly Margulis, Dinesh Rakheja, John Cheville, Bradley C Leibovich, Alexander Parker and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul H AcostaLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-3539
Vandana PanwarDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Vipul JarmaleLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6911-0898
Alana ChristieKidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Jay JastiLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Vitaly MargulisKidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Dinesh RakhejaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-7902
John ChevilleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bradley C LeibovichDepartment of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alexander ParkerOffice of Research Affairs, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
James BrugarolasKidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-8575-499X
Payal KapurDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4239-0495
Satwik RajaramLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-4402
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · USFlorida College · US

Funding

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center SPORE in Kidney CancerP50CA196516 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Brugarolas · 2016 to 2026
$24.7M
NON-INVASIVE PHYSIOLOGIC PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSIVENESS IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMAR01CA154475 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEDROSA, IVAN · 2011 to 2024
$4.3M
Vascular image-guided optimization of response (VIGOR) to therapy in kidney cancerR01CA244579 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, LI, PINNEY, KEVIN G. · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Glomerular Filtration of Sub-nm Gold NanoparticlesR01DK115986 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI ZHENG, JIE · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154475NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244579NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity arising from tumor evolution poses significant challenges biologically and clinically. Dissecting this complexity may benefit from deep learning (DL) algorithms, which can infer molecular features from ubiquitous hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissue sections. Although DL algorithms have been developed to predict some driver mutations from H&E images, the ability of these DL algorithms to resolve intratumoral mutation heterogeneity at subclonal spatial resolution is unexplored. Here, we apply DL to a paradigm of intratumoral heterogeneity, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common type of kidney cancer. Matched IHC and H&E images were leveraged to develop DL models for predicting intratumoral genetic heterogeneity of the three most frequently mutated ccRCC genes, BAP1, PBRM1, and SETD2. DL models were generated on a large cohort (N = 1,282) and tested on several independent cohorts, including a TCGA cohort (N = 363 patients) and two tissue microarray (TMA) cohorts (N = 118 and 365 patients). These models were also expanded to a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) TMA, affording analysis of homotopic and heterotopic interactions of tumor and stroma. The status of all three genes could be inferred by DL, with BAP1 showing the highest sensitivity and performance within and across tissue samples (AUC = 0.87-0.89 on holdout). BAP1 results were validated on independent human (AUC = 0.77-0.84) and PDX (AUC = 0.80) cohorts. Finally, BAP1 predictions correlated with clinical outputs such as disease-specific survival. Overall, these data show that DL models can resolve intratumoral heterogeneity in cancer with potential diagnostic, prognostic, and biological implications. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates the potential for deep learning analysis of histopathologic images to serve as a fast, low-cost method to assess genetic intratumoral heterogeneity. See related commentary by Song et al., p. 2672.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellDeep LearningKidney NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMutationNuclear ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseNuclear ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin Thiolesterase

Identifiers

PMID35654752
PMCPMC9373732
OpenAlexW4282925207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.