Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654679›Full record

SynthesisPrimary care diabetes2022

Risk of incident diabetes post-COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mainak Banerjee, Rimesh Pal, Sulagna Dutta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Primary care diabetes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidaemia as Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection-Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mainak BanerjeeDepartment of Endocrinology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata 700020, India. Electronic address: mainak18y@gmail.com.
Rimesh PalDepartment of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Sulagna DuttaDepartment of Pediatrics, AMRI Hospitals, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700098, India.
AMRI Hospitals · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains undetermined whether burden of diabetes newly detected during acute COVID-19 persist in post-acute COVID phase. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the available literature and provide a pooled estimate of the risk of developing incident diabetes following hospital discharge or at least 28 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis compared to matched controls or severity matched influenza/ non-COVID-19 acute upper respiratory tract infections (AURI). Pooled analysis of 5787,027 subjects from four observational studies showed 59 % higher risk of developing incident diabetes in post-acute COVID-19 phase versus healthy controls (HR:1.59; 95 % CI:1.40-1.81, p < 0.001, I

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusCOVID-19 TestingHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35654679
PMCPMC9148988
OpenAlexW4281650247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.