Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654574›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2022

Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016-2018: case details and respondent mortality.

Veronica A Pear, Rocco Pallin, Julia P Schleimer, Elizabeth Tomsich, Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz, Aaron B Shev, Christopher E Knoepke, Garen J Wintemute

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica A PearDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA vapear@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2462-3785
Rocco PallinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Julia P SchleimerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-7586
Elizabeth TomsichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Nicole Kravitz-WirtzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-0196
Aaron B ShevDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Christopher E KnoepkeAdult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-7157
Garen J WintemuteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · USOutcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

Decision Support for Older and Frail Patients Considering Advanced Cardiovascular Therapies: Improving Models of Personal Values ClarificationK23HL153892 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KNOEPKE, CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2024
$824k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGun violence restraining orders (GVROs), implemented in California in 2016, temporarily prohibit individuals at high risk of violence from purchasing or possessing firearms and ammunition. We sought to describe the circumstances giving rise to GVROs issued 2016-2018, provide details about the GVRO process and quantify mortality outcomes for individuals subject to these orders ('respondents').

methodsFor this cross-sectional description of GVRO respondents, 2016-2018, we abstracted case details from court files and used LexisNexis to link respondents to mortality data through August 2020.

resultsWe abstracted information for 201 respondents with accessible court records. Respondents were mostly white (61.2%) and men (93.5%). Fifty-four per cent of cases involved potential harm to others alone, 15.3% involved potential harm to self alone and 25.2% involved both. Mass shooting threats occurred in 28.7% of cases. Ninety-six and one half per cent of petitioners were law enforcement officers and one-in-three cases resulted in arrest on order service. One-year orders after a hearing (following 21-day emergency/temporary orders) were issued in 53.5% of cases. Most (84.2%) respondents owned at least one firearm, and firearms were removed in 55.9% of cases. Of the 379 respondents matched by LexisNexis, 7 (1.8%) died after the GVRO was issued: one from a self-inflicted firearm injury that was itself the reason for the GVRO and the others from causes unrelated to violence.

conclusionsGVROs were used most often by law enforcement officers to prevent firearm assault/homicide and post-GVRO firearm fatalities among respondents were rare. Future studies should investigate additional respondent outcomes and potential sources of heterogeneity.

Indexed as

FirearmsGun ViolenceSuicide PreventionWounds, GunshotCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesHomicideHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesDescriptive EpidemiologyFirearmLegislationSuicide/Self-HarmViolence

Identifiers

PMID35654574
PMCPMC9510437
OpenAlexW4281725373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.