Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654429›Full record

ArticleYearbook of medical informatics2022

Telehealth as a Means of Enabling Health Equity.

Craig Kuziemsky, Inga Hunter, Jai Ganesh Udayasankaran, Prasad Ranatunga, Gumindu Kulatunga, Sheila John, Oommen John, José F Flórez-Arango, Marcia Ito, Kendall Ho and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital Health Divides: Telehealth Equity in a Global Context-A Narrative Review with an Israeli Case Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pandemic Telehealth Utilization Among Ambulatory Care Diabetes Patients Managed at an Urban Teaching Hospital in Washington, DC.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Craig KuziemskyMacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Inga HunterMassey University, New Zealand.
Jai Ganesh UdayasankaranSri Sathya Sai Central Trust, India.
Prasad RanatungaProvincial Department of Health Services - North-Western Province - Sri Lanka.
Gumindu KulatungaHealth Information Unit, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.
Sheila JohnSankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Oommen JohnGeorge Institute for Global Health, UNSW, New Delhi, India.
José F Flórez-ArangoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Marcia ItoProfessional Master's Program in Productive Systems, Centro Estadual de Educação Tecnológica Paula Souza, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kendall HoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shahi B GogiaSociety for Administration of Telemedicine and Healthcare Informatics (SATHI), New Delhi, India.
Kleber AraujoNUTES - Núcleo de Telessaúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil.
Vije Kumar RajputKeele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Wouter J MeijerQuality Assurance eHealth, Netherlands.
Arindam BasuSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this paper is to provide a consensus review on telehealth delivery prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic to develop a set of recommendations for designing telehealth services and tools that contribute to system resilience and equitable health.

methodsThe IMIA-Telehealth Working Group (WG) members conducted a two-step approach to understand the role of telehealth in enabling global health equity. We first conducted a consensus review on the topic followed by a modified Delphi process to respond to four questions related to the role telehealth can play in developing a resilient and equitable health system.

resultsFifteen WG members from eight countries participated in the Delphi process to share their views. The experts agreed that while telehealth services before and during COVID-19 pandemic have enhanced the delivery of and access to healthcare services, they were also concerned that global telehealth delivery has not been equal for everyone. The group came to a consensus that health system concepts including technology, financing, access to medical supplies and equipment, and governance capacity can all impact the delivery of telehealth services.

conclusionTelehealth played a significant role in delivering healthcare services during the pandemic. However, telehealth delivery has also led to unintended consequences (UICs) including inequity issues and an increase in the digital divide. Telehealth practitioners, professionals and system designers therefore need to purposely design for equity as part of achieving broader health system goals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquityTelemedicineHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35654429
PMCPMC9719760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.