Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35654413›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2022

Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping to Predict Progression to High-Grade Cervical Precancer: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Southeastern United States.

Alexandra Bukowski, Cathrine Hoyo, Michael G Hudgens, Wendy R Brewster, Fidel Valea, Rex C Bentley, Adriana C Vidal, Rachel L Maguire, John W Schmitt, Susan K Murphy and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra BukowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-7340
Cathrine HoyoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-8617
Michael G HudgensDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9106-4194
Wendy R BrewsterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-3160
Fidel ValeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-4844-2399
Rex C BentleyDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-9150
Adriana C VidalDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3240-6668
Rachel L MaguireDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-2545
John W SchmittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8026-9119
Susan K MurphyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-7272
Kari E NorthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8903-0366
Jennifer S SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-0422
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USNC Department of Health and Human Services · USCarilion Clinic · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Duke University Program in Environmental HealthT32ES021432 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Akhenaton-Andrew Dhafir Jones, Joel Newman Meyer · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Disparities in cervical cancer precursors and deregulation of imprinted genesR01CA142983 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOYO, CATHRINE, MURPHY, SUSAN KAY · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
The effect of epigenetic DNA methylation on the progression of HPV-associated precancerous cervical lesionsF30CA257181 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alexandra Bukowski · 2021 to 2026
$203k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA257181NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142983NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES021432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing is utilized in primary cervical cancer screening, generally along with cytology, to triage abnormalities to colposcopy. Most screening-based hrHPV testing involves pooled detection of any hrHPV or of HPV16/18. Cervical neoplasia progression risks based on extended hrHPV genotyping-particularly non-16/18 hrHPV types-are not well characterized. HPV genotype-specific incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or more severe (CIN2+) following an abnormal screening result was examined.

methodsWe assessed a US-based prospective, multiracial, clinical cohort of 343 colposcopy patients with normal histology (n = 226) or CIN1 (n = 117). Baseline cervical samples underwent HPV DNA genotyping, and participants were followed up to 5 years. Genotype-specific CIN2+ incidence rates (IR) were estimated with accelerated failure time models. Five-year CIN2+ risks were estimated nonparametrically for hierarchical hrHPV risk groups (HPV16; else HPV18/45; else HPV31/33/35/52/58; else HPV39/51/56/59/68).

resultsAt enrollment, median participant age was 30.1 years; most (63%) were hrHPV-positive. Over follow-up, 24 participants progressed to CIN2+ (7.0%). CIN2+ IR among hrHPV-positive participants was 3.4/1,000 person-months. CIN2+ IRs were highest for HPV16 (8.3), HPV33 (7.8), and HPV58 (4.9). Five-year CIN2+ risk was higher for HPV16 (0.34) compared with HPV18/45 (0.12), HPV31/33/35/52/58 (0.12), and HPV39/51/56/59/68 (0.16) (P = 0.05).

conclusionsNon-16/18 hrHPV types are associated with differential CIN2+ progression rates. HPV16, 33, and 58 exhibited the highest rates over 5 years. HPV risk groups warrant further investigation in diverse US populations. IMPACT: These novel data assessing extended HPV genotyping in a diverse clinical cohort can inform future directions to improve screening practices in the general population.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenotypeHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansPapillomaviridaeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35654413
PMCPMC9350926
OpenAlexW4281964475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.