Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653892›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

Mechanisms for community prevention of violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A realist approach to a comparative analysis of qualitative data.

Hattie Lowe, Laura Brown, Ayesha Ahmad, Nayreen Daruwalla, Lu Gram, David Osrin, Krishna Panchal, Daniella Watson, Cathy Zimmerman, Jenevieve Mannell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Survivor Expectations and Experiences of One-Stop Crisis Centres in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study of Health System Responsiveness to Gender-Based Violence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Women's studies international forum
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hattie LoweInstitute for Global Health, University College London, UK. Electronic address: hattie.lowe@ucl.ac.
Laura BrownInstitute for Global Health, University College London, UK.
Ayesha AhmadSt George's, University of London, UK.
Nayreen DaruwallaSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), Mumbai, India.
Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, UK.
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, UK.
Krishna PanchalSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), Mumbai, India.
Daniella WatsonUniversity of Southampton, UK.
Cathy ZimmermanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Jenevieve MannellInstitute for Global Health, University College London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S033629/1Wellcome Trust 206417/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that community-based interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) can effectively address harmful social norms that promote or sustain gender inequality and drive violence against women (VAW). However, understanding what actions communities are already taking to address harmful social norms and prevent VAW is an essential first step for intervention development. Towards this goal, drawing on collective action theory, we conducted a realist analysis of secondary qualitative data collected with communities in India, Afghanistan, Peru and Rwanda. We coded interview and focus-group data from 232 participants to identify the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO) relevant for community action. We synthesized CMO configurations from each dataset into a conceptual framework composed of three middle-range theories of mechanisms driving community action to prevent VAW in LMICs. Our results highlight the importance of dedicated spaces for discussing VAW, VAW leaders as positive role models, and community perceptions of VAW as a problem worthy of intervention. In Rwanda and Peru, there was strong evidence to support the operation of these mechanisms. Contextual factors, including national and local policy and programmes targeting VAW, activated mechanisms that led to community action. In India and Afghanistan, evidence for the presence of these mechanisms was weaker, with social norms about women's position and violence being a private family matter preventing communities from addressing violence. Despite contextual differences, our data demonstrated communities in all four settings were somewhere along a pathway of change towards VAW prevention. This supports the need to build future prevention interventions on pre-existing mechanisms that trigger community action, rather than implementing existing interventions without local adaptation. Our conceptual framework serves as a tool for assessing these mechanisms of community action as part of intervention development research, centring community knowledge and fostering local ownership for more relevant and sustainable VAW prevention interventions.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesViolenceData AccuracyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPovertyAfghanistanCommunity-based interventionsIndiaIntervention development researchPeruRwandaViolence against women

Identifiers

PMID35653892
PMCPMC7614855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.