Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653856›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2022

[Gender inequality and mental health medicalization: Sociocultural determining factors from the analysis of expert perceptions].

Amaia Bacigalupe, Yolanda González-Rábago, Marta Jiménez-Carrillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amaia BacigalupeDepartamento de Sociología y Trabajo Social, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, Bizkaia, España; Grupo de Investigación en Determinantes Sociales de la Salud y Cambio Demográfico-OPIK, Bizkaia, España. Electronic address: amaia.bacigalupe@ehu.eus.
Yolanda González-RábagoDepartamento de Sociología y Trabajo Social, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, Bizkaia, España; Grupo de Investigación en Determinantes Sociales de la Salud y Cambio Demográfico-OPIK, Bizkaia, España.
Marta Jiménez-CarrilloDepartamento de Sociología y Trabajo Social, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, Bizkaia, España; Grupo de Investigación en Determinantes Sociales de la Salud y Cambio Demográfico-OPIK, Bizkaia, España; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud de Txurdinaga, OSI Bilbao-Basurto, Osakidetza, Bizkaia, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify the sociocultural roots that explain the higher frequency of diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety and the prescription of psychotropic drugs in women, in order to propose a preliminary explanatory framework for the investigation of gender inequalities in mental health and its medicalization. Qualitative study with a descriptive-interpretive design, through in-depth interviews conducted in January and February 2021. Interviews were held in various cities of the Basque Country, Barcelona and Madrid. 12 experts in gender and mental health from the clinical (Primary Care and Mental Health), academic and associative fields. Intentional sampling, following the snowball technique, until covering the diversity of previously identified profiles and the saturation of the discourse. An analysis of thematic content was carried out starting from a critical-realistic epistemological perspective. The main dimensions to explain gender inequalities in diagnoses of depression or anxiety and prescription of psychoactive drugs were: 1) the material and symbolic subordination of women, 2) the role of «psi» sciences in the pathologization of the feminine identity, 3) the epistemological and androcentric biases of biomedicine, and 4) the active agency of women in medicalization processes. The reduction of gender inequalities in the diagnoses and prescription of psychotropic drugs will require joint intervention at the clinical, community and structural levels that, from a feminist perspective, manage to reverse the socioeconomic, symbolic and epistemic vulnerability of women.

Indexed as

MedicalizationMental HealthFemaleGender IdentityHumansPsychotropic DrugsQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsPsychotropic DrugsDesigualdades socialesGenderGéneroMedicalizaciónMedicalizationMental healthSalud mentalSocial inequalities

Identifiers

PMID35653856
PMCPMC9160668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.