Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653638›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2022

Collision Cross-Section Calibration Strategy for Lipid Measurements in SLIM-Based High-Resolution Ion Mobility.

Bailey S Rose, Jody C May, Allison R Reardon, John A McLean

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bailey S RoseCenter for Innovative Technology, Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5900-7288
Jody C MayCenter for Innovative Technology, Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-5024
Allison R ReardonCenter for Innovative Technology, Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-0134
John A McLeanCenter for Innovative Technology, Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8918-6419
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structures for lossless ion manipulation-based high-resolution ion mobility (HRIM) interfaced with mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful tool for the separation and analysis of many isomeric systems. IM-derived collision cross section (CCS) is increasingly used as a molecular descriptor for structural analysis and feature annotation, but there are few studies on the calibration of CCS from HRIM measurements. Here, we examine the accuracy, reproducibility, and practical applicability of CCS calibration strategies for a broad range of lipid subclasses and develop a straightforward and generalizable framework for obtaining high-resolution CCS values. We explore the utility of using structurally similar custom calibrant sets as well as lipid subclass-specific empirically derived correction factors. While the lipid calibrant sets lowered overall bias of reference CCS values from ∼2-3% to ∼0.5%, application of the subclass-specific correction to values calibrated with a broadly available general calibrant set resulted in biases <0.4%. Using this method, we generated a high-resolution CCS database containing over 90 lipid values with HRIM. To test the applicability of this method to a broader class range typical of lipidomics experiments, a standard lipid mix was analyzed. The results highlight the importance of both class and arrival time range when correcting or scaling CCS values and provide guidance for implementation of the method for more general applications.

Indexed as

LipidsCalibrationIonsMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsIonsLipids

Identifiers

PMID35653638
PMCPMC9516683
OpenAlexW4281683895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.