Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653607›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

General Practitioners' Experiences of Professional Uncertainties Emerging from the Introduction of Video Consultations in General Practice: Qualitative Study.

Maja Nordtug, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Elle Christine Lüchau, Anette Grønning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The obscured face in video consultations. A Levinasian analysis.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maja NordtugDepartment for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-4245
Elisabeth Assing HvidtDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-8478
Elle Christine LüchauDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-0218
Anette GrønningDepartment for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5782-9739
University of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncertainties are omnipresent in health care, but little is known about general practitioners' (GPs) professional uncertainties concerning digital consultations. This is problematic, as many countries have undergone an extensive digital transformation.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the professional uncertainties that emerged among Danish GPs with the introduction of video consultations.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 15 Danish GPs during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The interviews were analyzed using an abductive approach.

resultsWe identified 3 categories of uncertainty: integrity, setting, and interaction. Respectively, these 3 categories of uncertainty refer to (1) uncertainties related to how technology may impede the provision of health care; (2) uncertainties related to the potentials of video technology; and (3) uncertainties related to how the video consultation technology affects interactions with patients.

conclusionsThe uncertainties experienced by Danish GPs appear to be a typical reaction to the introduction of new technology. Embedding video consultation technology into GPs' working routines will take time, and GPs do not necessarily feel intuitively capable of transferring their abilities, such as being good and socially present for video-mediated consultations. The heterogeneity of professional uncertainties experienced among the GPs suggests that they are the product of individual GP-technology relationships-not of the technology in itself. Consequently, we cannot expect that uncertainties can be remedied by changing or precluding new technology.

Indexed as

digital healthgeneral practice, COVID-19, doctor-patient communicationgeneral practitionerspandemicphysicianuncertaintiesvideo consultationvideo consultation technologyvirtual health

Identifiers

PMID35653607
PMCPMC9200054
OpenAlexW4281993070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.