Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653572›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Accurate virus identification with interpretable Raman signatures by machine learning.

Jiarong Ye, Yin-Ting Yeh, Yuan Xue, Ziyang Wang, Na Zhang, He Liu, Kunyan Zhang, RyeAnne Ricker, Zhuohang Yu, Allison Roder and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid, antibiotic incubation-free determination of tuberculosis drug resistance using machine learning and Raman spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jiarong YeCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Yin-Ting YehDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-9267
Yuan XueDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-5390-9037
Ziyang WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Na ZhangDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
He LiuDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Kunyan ZhangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
RyeAnne RickerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.ORCID 0000-0002-0869-1112
Zhuohang YuDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Allison RoderSystems Genomics Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Nestor Perea LopezDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Lindsey OrgantiniDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-1523
Wallace GreeneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033.
Susan HafensteinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Huaguang LuDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Elodie GhedinSystems Genomics Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Mauricio TerronesDepartment of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-2851
Shengxi HuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Sharon Xiaolei HuangCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0003-2338-6535

Funding

Genomic profiling of influenza infections to identify biomarkers of disease severityZIAAI001323 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI GHEDIN, ELODIE · 2020 to 2025
$8.0M
Determining factors of transmission and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in populations at risk ZIAAI001324 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI GHEDIN, ELODIE · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of newly emerging or circulating viruses is an important first step toward managing the public health response to potential outbreaks. A portable virus capture device, coupled with label-free Raman spectroscopy, holds the promise of fast detection by rapidly obtaining the Raman signature of a virus followed by a machine learning (ML) approach applied to recognize the virus based on its Raman spectrum, which is used as a fingerprint. We present such an ML approach for analyzing Raman spectra of human and avian viruses. A convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier specifically designed for spectral data achieves very high accuracy for a variety of virus type or subtype identification tasks. In particular, it achieves 99% accuracy for classifying influenza virus type A versus type B, 96% accuracy for classifying four subtypes of influenza A, 95% accuracy for differentiating enveloped and nonenveloped viruses, and 99% accuracy for differentiating avian coronavirus (infectious bronchitis virus [IBV]) from other avian viruses. Furthermore, interpretation of neural net responses in the trained CNN model using a full-gradient algorithm highlights Raman spectral ranges that are most important to virus identification. By correlating ML-selected salient Raman ranges with the signature ranges of known biomolecules and chemical functional groups—for example, amide, amino acid, and carboxylic acid—we verify that our ML model effectively recognizes the Raman signatures of proteins, lipids, and other vital functional groups present in different viruses and uses a weighted combination of these signatures to identify viruses.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerVirusesDisease OutbreaksPandemicsSerogroupinterpretable machine learningRaman spectroscopyvirus identification

Identifiers

PMID35653572
PMCPMC9191668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.