ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Advancing code sharing in the computational biology community.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Ten quick tips to build a Model Life Cycle.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for good model-sharing practices.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- For long-term sustainable software in bioinformatics.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for using public biological data for your research.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for computational analysis of medical images.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Eleven quick tips for data cleaning and feature engineering.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.