Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653351›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

A new test suggests hundreds of amino acid polymorphisms in humans are subject to balancing selection.

Vivak Soni, Michiel Vos, Adam Eyre-Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population Genetic Study ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Inferring Balancing Selection From Genome-Scale Data.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Review
  14. Deep Learning in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivak SoniSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9496-9562
Michiel VosEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Environment and Sustainability Institute, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3917-8151
Adam Eyre-WalkerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-8729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role that balancing selection plays in the maintenance of genetic diversity remains unresolved. Here, we introduce a new test, based on the McDonald-Kreitman test, in which the number of polymorphisms that are shared between populations is contrasted to those that are private at selected and neutral sites. We show that this simple test is robust to a variety of demographic changes, and that it can also give a direct estimate of the number of shared polymorphisms that are directly maintained by balancing selection. We apply our method to population genomic data from humans and provide some evidence that hundreds of nonsynonymous polymorphisms are subject to balancing selection.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsSelection, GeneticHumansPolymorphism, GeneticAmino Acids

Identifiers

PMID35653351
PMCPMC9162324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.