Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653155›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Pack-Hiding Behavior Among Smokers: The CASA Randomized Clinical Trial.

John P Pierce, Sheila Kealey, Eric C Leas, Kim Pulvers, Matthew D Stone, Jesica Oratowski, Elizabeth Brighton, Adriana Villaseñor, David R Strong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02676193 (Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676193 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2016 to 2022Enrolled359ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco SmokingArmsEffect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John P PierceCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Sheila KealeyCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Eric C LeasCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Kim PulversDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos.
Matthew D StoneHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.
Jesica OratowskiCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Elizabeth BrightonCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Adriana VillaseñorHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.
David R StrongCancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
University of California, San Diego · USHuman Longevity (United States) · USCalifornia State University, San Marcos · US

Funding

The Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior: A Randomized TrialR01CA190347 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PIERCE, JOHN P, STRONG, DAVID R · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
The role of ENDS use in changing rates of escalation and quitting of cigarette smoking in those under age 35 years in US populationR01CA234539 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BENMARHNIA, TARIK, PIERCE, JOHN P · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190347NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The inclusion of graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packs is recommended for tobacco control but has not yet been implemented in the US. It is unknown whether and to what extent the inclusion of GWLs on cigarette packs affects smokers' willingness to display the packs in public. Objective: To determine whether the inclusion of GWLs on cigarette packs affects pack-hiding behavior among smokers in social settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based randomized clinical trial assessed smokers' real-world experience of using cigarettes repackaged to include GWLs (GWL packs) compared with standard US packs and blank packs over a 3-month intervention period with 12 months of follow-up between September 6, 2016, and December 3, 2019. The study included 357 participants aged 21 to 65 years from San Diego County, California, who smoked 5 or more cigarettes per day, were not actively planning to quit smoking, were not pregnant, and had no unstable medical conditions. Participants purchased and received cigarette packs through the study website. Interventions: During the 1-month run-in period, participants received their usual US cigarette packs. During the 3-month intervention period, participants were randomized to receive GWL packs (study-manufactured packs with 3 rotating images under license from the Commonwealth of Australia; GWL pack group), blank packs (study-manufactured packs devoid of industry marketing imagery; blank pack group), or standard US packs (US pack group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Pack hiding was queried daily (with participants reporting behavior within the last 4 hours) and weekly via interactive text messages during the 1-month run-in and intervention periods. Self-reported smoking behavior was biochemically validated. Results: Among 357 enrolled participants, the mean (SD) age was 39.3 (11.8) years; 195 participants (54.6%) were female, 40 (11.2%) were Hispanic, 243 (68.1%) were non-Hispanic White, and 74 (20.7%) were of other non-Hispanic races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, or multiracial). A total of 18 987 cigarette packs were purchased and delivered during the run-in and intervention periods. Daily querying showed that the inclusion of GWLs on cigarette packs increased the percentage of smokers who hid their packs at least some of the time from 41.3% (95% CI, 39.6%-43.0%) during the run-in period to 57.1% (95% CI, 55.9%-58.1%) by the end of the intervention period. In the postintervention period, returning to standard US packs reduced pack-hiding behavior to the levels observed during the run-in period. Pack hiding remained at run-in levels for both the blank pack group (35.2%; 95% CI, 33.6%-36.8%) and the US pack group (41.4%; 95% CI, 39.7%-43.1%]) throughout the study. Although even participants in the GWL group with the lowest prestudy tendency to conceal score (ie, 1) had a mean (SE) probability of pack hiding during the intervention of 0.84 (0.02), this group's probability of pack hiding decreased to a mean (SE) of 0.43 (0.03) after intervention. When social reactions to packs were queried at the end of the study, the modal response from participants in the GWL pack group was observers' aversive reactions to the packs, whereas the modal response from participants in the blank pack group was observers' positive interest in the study. Neither smoking prevalence nor consumption differed by group at any point in the study. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, receiving cigarettes in GWL packs vs blank packs increased pack-hiding behavior in social settings, which may be associated with aversive reactions from observers. However, 12-month smoking behavior did not change. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02676193.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationTobacco ProductsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyProduct LabelingSmokersSmoking

Identifiers

PMID35653155
PMCPMC9164006
OpenAlexW4281895534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.