Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653148›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Integrated DNA and RNA Sequencing Reveals Drivers of Endocrine Resistance in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Youli Xia, Xiaping He, Lorna Renshaw, Carlos Martinez-Perez, Charlene Kay, Mark Gray, James Meehan, Joel S Parker, Charles M Perou, Lisa A Carey and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of targeted and immune combination therapies in a rat model of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tamoxifen Response at Single-Cell Resolution in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Primary Human Breast Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Youli XiaCurriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Xiaping HeLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-7910
Lorna RenshawEdinburgh Breast Unit Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Carlos Martinez-PerezEdinburgh Cancer Research Center, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-2832
Charlene KayEdinburgh Cancer Research Center, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-9528
Mark GrayEdinburgh Cancer Research Center, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-1425
James MeehanEdinburgh Cancer Research Center, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-0481
Joel S ParkerDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-6901
Charles M PerouCurriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9827-2247
Lisa A CareyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-4649
J Michael DixonEdinburgh Breast Unit Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Arran TurnbullEdinburgh Cancer Research Center, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2287-0889
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2017MAYPR896Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndocrine therapy resistance (ETR) remains the greatest challenge in treating patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We set out to identify molecular mechanisms underlying ETR through in-depth genomic analysis of breast tumors. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe collected pre-treatment and sequential on-treatment tumor samples from 35 patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant then adjuvant endocrine therapy; 3 had intrinsic resistance, 19 acquired resistance, and 13 remained sensitive. Response was determined by changes in tumor volume neoadjuvantly and by monitoring for adjuvant recurrence. Twelve patients received two or more lines of endocrine therapy, with subsequent treatment lines being initiated at the time of development of resistance to the previous endocrine therapy. DNA whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed on all samples, totalling 169 unique specimens. DNA mutations, copy-number alterations, and gene expression data were analyzed through unsupervised and supervised analyses to identify molecular features related to ETR.

resultsMutations enriched in ETR included ESR1 and GATA3. The known ESR1 D538G variant conferring ETR was identified, as was a rarer E380Q variant that confers endocrine hypersensitivity. Resistant tumors which acquired resistance had distinct gene expression profiles compared with paired sensitive tumors, showing elevated pathways including ER, HER2, GATA3, AKT, RAS, and p63 signaling. Integrated analysis in individual patients highlighted the diversity of ETR mechanisms.

conclusionsThe mechanisms underlying ETR are multiple and characterized by diverse changes in both somatic genetic and transcriptomic profiles; to overcome resistance will require an individualized approach utilizing genomic and genetic biomarkers and drugs tailored to each patient.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDNADrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaExome SequencingFemaleHumansReceptors, EstrogenSequence Analysis, RNADNAEstrogen Receptor alphaReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID35653148
PMCPMC7613305
OpenAlexW4282937977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.