Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653145›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2022

Treatment With Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy in Patients With High-risk Early Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prespecified Analysis of the monarchE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Miguel Martin, Roberto Hegg, Sung-Bae Kim, Michael Schenker, Daniela Grecea, Jose Angel Garcia-Saenz, Konstantinos Papazisis, QuChang Ouyang, Aleksandra Lacko, Berna Oksuzoglu and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03155997 (A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03155997 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2017 to 2029Enrolled5,637ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAbemaciclib, Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Axillary management in patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a call for de-escalation.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 17 institutions in 12 countries.

Miguel MartinMedical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Cáncer, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto HeggClinica de Pesquisa e Centro São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sung-Bae KimAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Michael SchenkerCentrul de Oncologie Sf Nectarie SRL, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Daniela GreceaInstitutul Oncologic "Prof.Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Jose Angel Garcia-SaenzMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
Konstantinos PapazisisEuromedica, General Clinic of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
QuChang OuyangHunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Aleksandra LackoDolnoslaskie Centrum Onkologii, Uniwersytet Medyczny we Wroclawiu, Wroclaw, Poland.
Berna OksuzogluDr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
James ReevesFlorida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers.
Meena OkeraAdelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, Australia.
Laura TestaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chikako ShimizuNational Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Neelima DenduluriVirginia Cancer Specialists, US Oncology Network, Arlington, Virginia.
Hryhoriy AdamchukCommunal Enterprise "Kryvyi Rih oncology dispensary" Dnipr region, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.
Shaker DakhilCancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas.
Ran WeiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Tammy ForresterEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Maria Munoz FernandezEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Annamaria ZimmermannEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Desiree HeadleyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Stephen R D JohnstonRoyal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USGEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group · ESAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRCancer Center of Kansas · USCentre for Cancer Biology · AUCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BREuromedica · GRHunan Cancer Hospital · CNInstitute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta · RONational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPNational Health Service · GBSarah Cannon · USUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROUniversity of Ulsan · KRVirginia Cancer Specialists · USWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients selected to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are usually those at higher risk of relapse, and there is a need to find better therapeutic options for these patients. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-, high-risk early breast cancer enrolled in the randomized clinical trial monarchE who received NAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: The monarchE randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, phase 3, open-label study that evaluated adjuvant treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) compared with ET alone in patients with HR+, ERBB2-, and node-positive early breast cancer who were at high risk of recurrence. Patients were recruited between July 2017 and August 2019 from 603 sites in 38 countries. This subgroup analysis was performed with primary outcome data, with a cutoff date of July 8, 2020. Intervention: Enrolled patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard of care ET for at least 5 years with or without treatment with abemaciclib (150 mg, twice daily) for 2 years (treatment period) or until criteria were met for discontinuation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prior chemotherapy (NAC vs adjuvant vs none) was a stratification factor in monarchE, and and a prespecified exploratory analysis included outcomes in patients who received NAC. The data presented in this article are from the primary outcome analysis (395 invasive disease-free survival [IDFS] events; cutoff date, July 8, 2020; median follow-up 19 months [IQR, 15.6-23.9 months]). Invasive disease-free survival (the primary end point of monarchE) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 5637 patients (mean [SD] age, 49.9 [10.6] years; 2046 women [99.5%]; 462 Asian [22.8%], 54 Black [2.7%], and 1473 White participants [70.8%]) enrolled in monarchE, 2056 (37%) received treatment with NAC. In this subgroup, treatment with abemaciclib and ET demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit in IDFS (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) and DRFS (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.81), which corresponded with an absolute improvement of 6.6% in 2-year IDFS rates and 6.7% in 2-year DRFS rates. A consistent treatment benefit was observed across subgroups of pathological breast tumor size or number of positive lymph nodes at surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: In the randomized clinical trial monarchE, treatment with adjuvant abemaciclib combined with ET demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in IDFS and DRFS for patients with HR+, ERBB2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer who received NAC before trial enrollment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03155997.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalabemaciclibAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID35653145
PMCPMC9164117
OpenAlexW4281645436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.