Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653038›Full record

ArticleThe patient2022

Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: What They are and Why We Need Them.

Eleanor M Perfetto, Elisabeth M Oehrlein, T Rosie Love, Silke Schoch, Annie Kennedy, Jennifer Bright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. QALYs: The Math Doesn't Work.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor M PerfettoNational Health Council, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8150-1058
Elisabeth M OehrleinNational Health Council, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-3958
T Rosie LovePharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Room 01-328, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. troseganser@umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4641-8421
Silke SchochNational Health Council, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3203-1330
Annie KennedyEveryLife Foundation for Rare Diseases, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-675X
Jennifer BrightInnovation and Value Initiative (IVI), Alexandria, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-3979
National Health Council · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quote attributed to Mark Twain states, "What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so." The growing focus on patient centricity has revealed a misalignment between what patients report as important to them about their disease and/or treatment, and the data collected in research and care. Decisions across healthcare are made using an evidence base most stakeholders acknowledge is inadequate. Patients might report that what is important to them are everyday life impacts, concepts that can be very different from the more typical clinical outcomes we often track. In this paper, we encourage expanding current thinking to all "impacts," not only health outcomes, but also the other equally (and sometimes more important) concerns patients report as important to them. We propose that a patient-centered core impact set be developed for each disease or condition of interest, and/or subpopulation of patients. A patient-centered core impact set begins with gathering from patients and caregivers an inventory of all impacts disease and treatments have on a patient's (and carers' and families') life. Then, through a formal prioritization process, a core set of impacts is derived, inclusive of but extending beyond relevant health outcomes. We offer several recommendations on how to move the goal of a patient-centered core impact set forward through collaboration, leadership, and establishment of a patient-centered core impact set development blueprint with supporting tools.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID35653038
PMCPMC9584872
OpenAlexW4281692614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.