Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35653028›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2022

Management reasoning scripts: Qualitative exploration using simulated physician-patient encounters.

David A Cook, Christopher R Stephenson, Larry D Gruppen, Steven J Durning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A CookOffice of Applied Scholarship and Education Science, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA. cook.david33@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-4633
Christopher R StephensonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8537-392X
Larry D GruppenDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-0126
Steven J DurningCenter for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-1597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement reasoning is distinct from diagnostic reasoning and remains incompletely understood. The authors sought to empirically investigate the concept of management scripts.

methodsIn November 2020, 4 investigators each reviewed 10 video clips of simulated outpatient physician-patient encounters, and used a coding form to document observations about management reasoning. The team used constant comparative analysis to integrate empirically-grounded insights with theories related to cognitive scripts and Type 1/Type 2 thinking.

resultsManagement scripts are precompiled conceptual knowledge structures that represent and connect management options and clinician tasks in a temporal or logical sequence. Management scripts appear to differ substantially from illness scripts. Management scripts varied in quality (in content, sequence, flexibility, and fluency) and generality. The authors empirically identified six key features (components) of management scripts: the problem (diagnosis); management options; preferences, values, and constraints; education needs; interactions; and encounter flow. The authors propose a heuristic framework describing script activation, selection, instantiation with case-specific details, and application to guide development of the management plan. They further propose that management reasoning reflects iterative, back-and-forth involvement of both Type 1 (non-analytic, effortless) and Type 2 (analytic, effortful) thinking. Type 1 thinking likely influences initial script activation, selection, and initial instantiation. Type 2 increasingly influences subsequent script revisions, as activation, selection, and instantiation become more deliberate (effortful) and more hypothetical (involving mental simulation). DISCUSSION: Management scripts constitute a key feature of management reasoning, and could represent a new target for training in clinical reasoning (distinct from illness scripts).

Indexed as

PhysiciansHumansKnowledgeLogicPhysician-Patient RelationsClinical decision-makingDiagnostic errorsDiagnostic reasoningEducation, medicalTherapeutic reasoning

Identifiers

PMID35653028
PMCPMC9391545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.