ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Comparison of patient demographics, utilization trends, and costs of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle fusion in the United States from 2010 to 2019.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContemporary studies evaluating utilization and trends of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle fusion (AF) for tibiotalar osteoarthritis are sparse. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to utilize a nationwide administrative claims database from 2010 to 2019 to compare: (1) baseline demographics; (2) utilization, (3) in-hospital length of stay (LOS), and (4) costs of care.
methodsUsing the PearlDiver database, a retrospective query from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2019 was performed for all patients who underwent TAA and AF for tibiotalar osteoarthritis. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and geographic utilization were compared using Pearson Chi-square analyses. Linear regression was used to compare differences in procedure utilization and in-hospital LOS during the study interval. Reimbursements between the two cohorts during the study interval were compared. A p value less than 0.05 was statistically significant.
resultsIn total, 14,248 patients underwent primary TAA (n = 5544) or AF (n = 8704). Patients undergoing AF were generally younger (< 60) with greater comorbidity burden driven by hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and tobacco use compared to TAA patients (p < 0.0001). Over the study interval, TAA utilization remained constant (912 vs 909 procedures; p = 0.807), whereas AF utilization decreased by 42.5% (1737 vs 998 procedures; p = 0.0001). Mean in-hospital LOS for patients undergoing TAA decreased (2.5 days vs. 2.0 days, p = 0.0004), while AF LOS increased (2.6 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.0003). Reimbursements for both procedures significantly declined over the study interval (TAA: $4559-$2156, AF: $4729-$1721; p < 0.013).
conclusionTAA utilization remained constant, while AF utilization declined by 42.5% from 2010 to 2019. There was divergence in the LOS for TAA versus AF patients. Both procedures significantly declined by over 50% in reimbursements over the study interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.