Trial reportUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022
Effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group block with ultrasonography in patients diagnosed with hip fracture in the emergency department.
Trial report in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients
Quality Of Recovery After Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block For Hip Hemiarthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture pain management in the emergency department: results of the ED-PENG-B randomised controlled trial.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Positional Pain Management Before Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Who Underwent Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Trial
- Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block and femoral nerve block in spinal anesthesia position analgesia for proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients: a randomized clinical trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023Trial
- Pericapsular Nerve Group block in the emergency department for hip fractures: a clinical protocol.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) blocks are safe and effective.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Regional Nerve Blocks for Trauma Pain in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip fractures (HF) are among the most common fractures present in the emergency department and are very painful. Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a new regional anesthesia technique developed for analgesia in total hip arthroplas-ties. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of PENG block used to reduce pain in patients with HF in the emergency department.
methodsThis single-center, randomized, and prospective study was carried out in the emergency department. The patients in-cluded in the study were selected according to the suitability of the personnel who will perform the procedure. The sealed envelope system was used for randomization.
resultsStatistical analysis was performed with 39 patients (18 patients in the PENG group, 21 patients in the control group). Thir-teen (33.3%) of the patients were female and 26 (66.7%) were male. The mean age was 75.3. At rest post-procedure, the mean Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores of the patients at the 30th min, 2nd, 6th, and 24th h were 1.78±1.83, 0.00±0.00, 0.00±0.00, and 1.28±1.41 in the PENG group. On the other hand, it was 3.38±1.86, 0.05±0.22, 2.86±2.37, and 4.95±1.47 in the control group, respectively. The mean NRS scores of the patients at 15° elevation of the leg at the 30th min, 2nd, 6th, and 24th h were 3.06±1.80, 0.06±0.24, 0.22±0.43, and 2.44±1.50 in the PENG group and it was 5.24±1.81, 1.05±0.92, 4.29±2.35, and 7.14±1.24 in the control group, respectively.
conclusionPENG block can reduce pain and the need for systemic analgesics as a practical option in patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.