Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652762›Full record

ReviewMolecular ecology resources2022

Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.

Magdalena Nagler, Sabine Marie Podmirseg, Judith Ascher-Jenull, Daniela Sint, Michael Traugott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magdalena NaglerDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-7290
Sabine Marie PodmirsegDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-2412
Judith Ascher-JenullDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-8058
Daniela SintDepartment of Zoology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-4284
Michael TraugottDepartment of Zoology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-5059

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing the monitoring of biodiversity as it allows to assess organismic diversity at large scale and unprecedented taxonomic detail. However, eDNA consists of an extracellular and intracellular fraction, each characterized by particular properties that determine the retrievable information on when and where organisms live or have been living. Here, we review the fractions of eDNA, describe how to obtain them from environmental samples and present a four-scenario concept that aims at enhancing spatial and temporal resolution of eDNA-based monitoring. Importantly, we highlight how the appropriate choice of eDNA fractions precludes misinterpretation of eDNA-based biodiversity data. Finally, future avenues of research towards eDNA fraction-specific analyses are outlined to unravel the full potential of eDNA-based studies targeting micro- and macro-organisms.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityBiological MonitoringDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEnvironmental MonitoringDNA, Environmentalallochthonous DNAancient DNAbiodiversity assessmentenvironmental DNAextracellular DNAintracellular DNAmetabarcodingspatial resolutiontemporal resolution

Identifiers

PMID35652762
PMCPMC9545497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.