Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652588›Full record

ArticleBJS open2022

Preoperative biomarkers related to inflammation may identify high-risk anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery: explorative study.

Klas Holmgren, Pär Jonsson, Christina Lundin, Peter Matthiessen, Jörgen Rutegård, Malin Sund, Martin Rutegård

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development and validation of an anastomotic risk score for use in a randomized clinical trial on defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Klas HolmgrenDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-1304
Pär JonssonDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Christina LundinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Peter MatthiessenDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Jörgen RutegårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Malin SundDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7516-9543
Martin RutegårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-6373
Umeå University · SEÖrebro University · SEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal anastomotic leakage can be considered a process of failed wound healing, for which related biomarkers might be a promising research area to decrease leak rates.

methodsPatients who had elective surgery with a primary anastomosis for non-metastatic colorectal cancer, at two university hospitals between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were included. Patients with an anastomotic leak were identified and matched (1:1) to complication-free controls on the basis of sex, age, tumour stage, tumour location, and operating hospital. Preoperative blood samples were analysed by use of protein panels associated with systemic or enteric inflammation by proteomics, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Multivariable projection methods were used in the statistical analyses and adjusted for multiple comparisons to reduce false positivity. Rectal cancer tissue samples were evaluated with immunohistochemistry to determine local expression of biomarkers that differed significantly between cases and controls.

resultsOut of 726 patients undergoing resection, 41 patients with anastomotic leakage were matched to 41 controls. Patients with rectal cancer with leakage displayed significantly elevated serum levels of 15 proteins related to inflammation. After controlling for a false discovery rate, levels of C-X-C motif chemokine 6 (CXCL6) and C-C motif chemokine 11 (CCL11) remained significant. In patients with colonic cancer with leakage, levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were increased before surgery. Local expression of CXCL6 and CCL11, and their receptors, were similar in rectal tissues between cases and controls.

conclusionPatients with anastomotic leakage could have an upregulated inflammatory response before surgery, as expressed by elevated serological levels of CXCL6 and CCL11 for rectal cancer and hs-CRP levels in patients with colonic cancer respectively.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAnastomotic LeakBiomarkersChemokinesC-Reactive ProteinHumansInflammationBiomarkersChemokinesC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID35652588
PMCPMC9161645
OpenAlexW4225499448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.