Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652562›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2022

Self-regulation of the brain's right frontal Beta rhythm using a brain-computer interface.

Nadja Enz, Jemima Schmidt, Kate Nolan, Matthew Mitchell, Sandra Alvarez Gomez, Miryam Alkayyali, Pierce Cambay, Magdalena Gippert, Robert Whelan, Kathy Ruddy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neurofeedback in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadja EnzSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2476-4710
Jemima SchmidtSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate NolanSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Matthew MitchellSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sandra Alvarez GomezSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Miryam AlkayyaliSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Pierce CambaySchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Magdalena GippertSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Robert WhelanSchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2790-7281
Kathy RuddySchool of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-0423
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural oscillations, or brain rhythms, fluctuate in a manner reflecting ongoing behavior. Whether these fluctuations are instrumental or epiphenomenal to the behavior remains elusive. Attempts to experimentally manipulate neural oscillations exogenously using noninvasive brain stimulation have shown some promise, but difficulty with tailoring stimulation parameters to individuals has hindered progress in this field. We demonstrate here using electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback in a brain-computer interface that human participants (n = 44) learned over multiple sessions across a 6-day period to self-regulate their Beta rhythm (13-20 Hz), either up or down, over the right inferior frontal cortex. Training to downregulate Beta was more effective than training to upregulate Beta. The modulation was evident only during neurofeedback task performance but did not lead to offline alteration of Beta rhythm characteristics at rest, nor to changes in subsequent cognitive behavior. Likewise, a control group (n = 38) who underwent training to up or downregulate the Alpha rhythm (8-12 Hz) did not exhibit behavioral changes. Although the right frontal Beta rhythm has been repeatedly implicated as a key component of the brain's inhibitory control system, the present data suggest that its manipulation offline prior to cognitive task performance does not result in behavioral change in healthy individuals. Whether this form of neurofeedback training could serve as a useful therapeutic target for disorders with dysfunctional inhibitory control as their basis remains to be tested in a context where performance is abnormally poor and neural dynamics are different.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeurofeedbackSelf-ControlAlpha RhythmBeta RhythmBrainElectroencephalographyHumansalpha oscillationsbeta oscillationsbrain-computer interfaceinhibitory controlneurofeedbackstop signal task

Identifiers

PMID35652562
PMCPMC9786254
OpenAlexW4281649495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.