Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652538›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

Clarifying the role of clinical research nurses working in Sweden, using the Clinical Trial Nursing Questionnaire - Swedish version.

Beatrice Backman Lönn, Senada Hajdarevic, Niclas Olofsson, Åsa Hörnsten, Johan Styrke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  6. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatrice Backman LönnDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-1297
Senada HajdarevicDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-8269
Niclas OlofssonDepartment of Health Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Åsa HörnstenDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johan StyrkeDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the role of CRNs in Sweden and differences in competences and tasks, using the Clinical Trial Nursing Questionnaire - Swedish version (CTNQ-SWE).

designA cross-sectional survey.

methodsParticipants were identified through strategic sampling. Data were analysed by descriptive and comparative statistics.

resultsThe respondents were experienced nurses who felt proficient in their role, they felt more acceptance by the principal investigators than by nursing colleagues. A majority of CRNs are involved in all procedures specified in the CTNQ-SWE. The most often performed tasks, also rated as the most important by the CRNs, concerned informed consent and management of investigational products. The education was often informal: with a lack of job descriptions and professional development plans. Need of formal specialist education was expressed.

conclusionsKnowledge about the role description can be used by clinical research enterprise internationally and healthcare organizations aiming to support CRNs in their role.

Indexed as

Clinical Nursing ResearchNurse's RoleClinical Trials as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenclinical research nurseclinical study coordinatorclinical trial nurseclinical trial nursing questionnairecompetencenurseprofessional developmentregistered nurseroleswedishtasks

Identifiers

PMID35652538
PMCPMC9374401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.