ArticleAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry2023
Efficacy and Safety of Lobaplatin-TACE in the Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Regorafenib and PD-1 Inhibitor as Second-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Lobaplatin induces apoptosis in T24 and 5637 bladder cancer cells by regulating Bcl-2 and Bax expression and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the Third-Line Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin-TACE in treating primary hepatocellular carcinoma.
methodsThe data of 536 patients who underwent TACE in the interventional department from January 2016 to January 2020 were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic drugs used in TACE.: the epirubicin-TACE group (N = 260) and the lobaplatin-TACE group (N = 276). Primary study endpoint: (1) The tumor response after TACE; (2) The survival rates; Secondary study endpoints:(1) Changes in liver function and blood routine before and after TACE; (2) Occurrence of the post-embolization syndrome and infection after TACE.
resultsThe ORR was 35.0% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 51.1% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.001). The DCR was 73.1% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 82.2% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.011). The 6-month, 9- month, 12-month, and 15-month survival rates were higher in the lobaplatin-TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.029, p=0.001, p=0.005, p=0.002). mOS: Epirubicin-TACE group,14.8 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,18.6 months (p=0.007). mPFS: Epirubicin-TACE group,9.5 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,12.8 months (P =0.000). There was no statistical difference in ALT, AST, total bilirubin and Leucocyte after TACE between the two groups (p=0.343, p=0.368, p=0.288, p=0.359). The platelet decrease after TACE was more significant in the lobaplatin- TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.046). There was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of abdominal pain, fever and infection after TACE between the two groups (p=0.502, p=0.602, p=0.726). The incidence of vomiting after TACE in the lobaplatin-TACE group was higher than that in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.003).
conclusionLobaplatin-TACE has a higher tumor response rate and survival rate. Lobaplatin-TACE is a safe and effective treatment strategy; it is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.