Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652310›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods.

Anita Tolpinrud, John Stenos, Anne-Lise Chaber, Joanne M Devlin, Catherine Herbert, An Pas, Magdalena Dunowska, Mark A Stevenson, Simon M Firestone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anita TolpinrudAsia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbournegrid.1008.9, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5938-3013
John StenosAustralian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Anne-Lise ChaberSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
Joanne M DevlinAsia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbournegrid.1008.9, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Catherine HerbertSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
An PasNew Zealand Centre for Conservation Medicine, Auckland Zoo, Auckland, New Zealand.
Magdalena DunowskaSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey Universitygrid.148374.d, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Mark A Stevenson *Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbournegrid.1008.9, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Simon M Firestone *Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbournegrid.1008.9, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3239-1419

Funding

Cybec Foundation (Cybec)Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (Australian Government) RnD4Profit-15-02-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.

Indexed as

Coxiella burnetiiQ FeverAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBayes TheoremEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectMacropodidaeSeroepidemiologic StudiesVictoriaAntibodies, BacterialBayesian latent class modelsCoxiella burnetiiELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayimmunofluorescence assaymacropodsQ feversensitivityspecificitytest validation

Identifiers

PMID35652310
PMCPMC9297833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.