Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652024›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2022

Periprosthetic Knee Infection - Part 2: Treatment.

João Maurício Barretto, André Luiz Siqueira Campos, Nelson Hiroyuki Miyabe Ooka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

João Maurício BarrettoHospital São Vicente da Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-2031
André Luiz Siqueira CamposDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9400-4023
Nelson Hiroyuki Miyabe OokaDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0853-7630
D’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRHospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado · BRHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several treatment modalities are proposed for periprosthetic infections, with variable success rates. However, efficacy is related to the appropriate selection of cases for each type of treatment. Debridement with implant retention is indicated in acute infections with fixed implant, and its success depends on the type of infection, comorbidities of the host, and virulence of the etiological agent. One- or two-stage revision is required in cases in which biofilm is forming, or of implant loosening. The choice between performing the review in one or two stages depends on factors such as etiological agent identification, pathogen virulence, local and systemic host factors. Rescue procedures such as arthrodesis, amputation, resection arthroplasty or even antibiotic suppression are reserved for cases in which the infection has not been eradicated.

Indexed as

antibioticarthroplasty, replacement, kneesurgical reviewsurgical site infectiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID35652024
PMCPMC9142269
OpenAlexW4282003357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.