ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Elaboration and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Axillary Ultrasound and Tumor Clinicopathological Features to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative complications in thymoma patients.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Nomogram models for prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- An Intraoperative Ultrasound Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes: Cassandra Predictive Models in Patients with Breast Cancer-A Multicentric Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis of microinvasive breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Ultrasound Pretreatment Lymph Node Evaluation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Should We Biopsy High Suspicion Nodes?Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Noninvasive Staging of Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning: External Validation and Further Model Development.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Noninvasive prediction of node-positive breast cancer response to presurgical neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy based on machine learning of axillary lymph node ultrasound.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastatic Load of Breast Cancer Based on Ultrasound Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Establishment of Prediction Model of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis Before Operation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed at constructing a nomogram to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) based on axillary ultrasound and tumor clinicopathological features. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 281 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer was performed between January 2015 and March 2018. All patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 197) and a validation cohort (n = 84). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the clinically important predictors of ALNM when developin1 g the nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram. Results: In univariate and multivariate analyses, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), axillary lymph node (ALN) cortex thickness, and an obliterated ALN fatty hilum were identified as independent predictors and integrated to develop a nomogram for predicting ALNM. The nomogram showed favorable sensitivity for ALNM with AUCs of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.92) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.92) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration plots of the nomogram showed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual ALNM diagnosis (P > 0.05). Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed the net benefit of the nomogram. Conclusions: This study developed a nomogram based on three daily available clinical parameters, with good accuracy and clinical utility, which may help the radiologist in decision-making for ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy (US-FNAC/B) according to the nomogram score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.