Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35651790›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Measurement of Sarcopenia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Its Association With Frailty.

Remco de Bree, Christiaan D A Meerkerk, Gyorgy B Halmos, Antti A Mäkitie, Akihiro Homma, Juan P Rodrigo, Fernando López, Robert P Takes, Jan B Vermorken, Alfio Ferlito

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Christiaan D A MeerkerkDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gyorgy B HalmosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Antti A MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Akihiro HommaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Juan P RodrigoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Fernando LópezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Robert P TakesDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jan B VermorkenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alfio FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHelsinki University Hospital · FIHokkaido University · JPRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In head and neck cancer (HNC) there is a need for more personalized treatment based on risk assessment for treatment related adverse events (i.e. toxicities and complications), expected survival and quality of life. Sarcopenia, defined as a condition characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, can predict adverse outcomes in HNC patients. A review of the literature on the measurement of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer patients and its association with frailty was performed. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measurement only is often used to determine if sarcopenia is present or not. SMM is most often assessed by measuring skeletal muscle cross-sectional area on CT or MRI at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. As abdominal scans are not always available in HNC patients, measurement of SMM at the third cervical vertebra has been developed and is frequently used. Frailty is often defined as an age-related cumulative decline across multiple physiologic systems, with impaired homeostatic reserve and a reduced capacity of the organism to withstand stress, leading to increased risk of adverse health outcomes. There is no international standard measure of frailty and there are multiple measures of frailty. Both sarcopenia and frailty can predict adverse outcomes and can be used to identify vulnerable patients, select treatment options, adjust treatments, improve patient counselling, improve preoperative nutritional status and anticipate early on complications, length of hospital stay and discharge. Depending on the definitions used for sarcopenia and frailty, there is more or less overlap between both conditions. However, it has yet to be determined if sarcopenia and frailty can be used interchangeably or that they have additional value and should be used in combination to optimize individualized treatment in HNC patients.

Indexed as

complicationselderlyfrailtyhead and neck cancersarcopeniaskeletal muscle masssurvivaltoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35651790
PMCPMC9150392
OpenAlexW4283389175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.