Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35651716›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022

The Rule of Law for the Exercise of Marriage and Reproductive Rights for Women with Intellectual Disabilities in China.

Zhengzong Huang, Baoxin Chen, Zehua Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhengzong Huang *Law School, Hainan University, Haikou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0542-4860
Baoxin Chen *Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, People's Republic of China.
Zehua FengSchool of Law, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics · CNHainan University · CNMacao Polytechnic University · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with intellectual disabilities (WIDs) are entitled to the rights to marriage and reproduction under Chinese law. However, Chinese marriage and reproduction regimes have imposed restrictions on their right to marry that limit the exercise of their reproductive rights. Marrying WIDs has become a popular choice for men in rural areas. Although in China's Civil Code, the legislature has repealed the prior requirement of a medical examination for marriage registration, the exercise of rights to marriage and reproduction by WIDs is still restricted. China has not fully implemented equal rights for persons with disabilities under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. China needs to set legal procedural requirements for the exercise of these rights for different types of WIDs, systematically constructing them at three levels: legal basis, legislative implementation, and institutional support.

Indexed as

Chinese lawmarriagemarriage and family lawpeople with intellectual disabilitiesreproductive rights

Identifiers

PMID35651716
PMCPMC9149587
OpenAlexW4285743653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.