ArticleTransplantation direct2022
Retrospective Evaluation of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Heart Transplant Patients.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dosing intensity of antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy in heart transplantation remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rabbit antithymocyte globulin at a total dose of 4.5 mg/kg compared with <4.5 mg/kg. Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 2016 to December 2018 at a single quaternary care center. Exposure was defined as full antithymocyte globulin (4.5 mg/kg total) induction compared with partial (<4.5 mg/kg) induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 1990 acute cellular rejection grade 2 or above at 2 y. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, number of infections, and time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare rejection rates and mortality. Results: Of 201 patients, 61 received partial and 140 received full induction. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of cellular rejection grade 2 or above (18% versus 11.4%, Conclusions: There was no difference in overall risk for any grade cellular rejection between partial or full dose induction therapy. Additionally, there was no difference in medium-term mortality from landmark survival analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.