Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cataract Surgeries in the United States.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prioritizations in Swedish cataract surgery - when resources are limited-Exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025
   Article
2. From normalcy to pandemic: analyzing cataract surgery patterns through case volumes and Google Trends (2014-2020).Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2025
   Article
3. Impact of Global Optimization of Lens Constants on Absolute Prediction Error for Final IOL Power Selection When Using Intraoperative Aberrometry.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
   Article
4. Quantification and Analysis of Laser Peripheral Iridotomies in the United States from 2000 to 2021.Journal of current glaucoma practice
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.