ArticleJAMIA open2022
Development and validation of
Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for improving decision-making in bacterial infection management: a narrative review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Review
- Validation of an Algorithm to Classify Urine Cultures in Family Medicine.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- A case report of rapid diagnosis ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Northwestern University resource and education development initiatives to advance collaborative artificial intelligence across the learning health system.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Transportability of bacterial infection prediction models for critically ill patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Microbiology culture reports contain critical information for important clinical and public health applications. However, microbiology reports often have complex, semistructured, free-text data that present a barrier for secondary use. Here we present the development and validation of an open-source package designed to ingest free-text microbiology reports, determine whether the culture is positive, and return a list of Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED)-CT mapped bacteria. Materials and Methods: Our concept extraction Python package, Results: Discussion: Our results suggest that Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.