Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35651460›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Comparison of the Fetal Fraction of Cell-Free DNA in In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Versus Natural Conception Evaluation of the Fetal Fraction With IVF Parameters.

Kostas Kallianidis, Evangelia Dimitroulia, Depy Mavrogianni, Emmanuaela Liokari, Ritsa Bletsa, Elli Anagnostou, Nikos Sofikitis, Dimitrios Loutradis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kostas KallianidisFertility Institute, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC.
Evangelia DimitrouliaDepartment of Microbiology, Biopathology Unit, Evgenidion Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Depy Mavrogianni1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC.
Emmanuaela LiokariFertility Institute, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Ritsa BletsaFertility Institute, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC.
Elli Anagnostou1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC.
Nikos SofikitisUrology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, GRC.
Dimitrios LoutradisObstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background As the offspring of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) have become a substantial proportion of the population, increased attention has been placed on the safety of ART. Investigators have focused on identifying a tool that combines molecular or biological tests that can predict the outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the resulting pregnancy after ART-mediated embryo implantation. This study aimed to answer the following questions: is there a difference between natural conception and IVF pregnancies regarding fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal age, birth weight, gender, and gestational age? Is there a difference between FF concentration regarding the parameters of IVF as possible predictive factors affecting the outcomes of IVF? Methodology This study included 31 women with singleton pregnancies conceived via IVF who underwent cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21; sex determination; and FF. The control group included 55 women who experienced natural conception. For all women, anthropometric characteristics such as age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. For the IVF group, early follicular phase values of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, anti-müllerian hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and estradiol were recorded. Results The natural conception and IVF groups were similar regarding maternal age, BMI of the mother, gender, birth weight, and gestational age. FF was not significantly different between the natural conception and IVF groups (10 (3.8) vs. 9 (2.6); p = 0.144). The results were similar after adjusting for maternal age via regression analysis. cfDNA was not associated with maternal age, birth weight, gender, or gestational age in the entire study sample or separately for the natural conception and IVF groups. No significant correlation was found between cfDNA and IVF parameters. Conclusions The FF is an important factor for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) accuracy. Several studies have found a reduction in FF in pregnancies following ART compared with natural conception, while other studies have presented no differences in the FF. All researchers agree on the importance of NIPT; however, knowledge on how the FF is affected in ART pregnancies compared with naturally conceived pregnancies is very limited. In this study, no difference in FF for the IVF group compared with natural conception women was observed. The cffDNA concentrations in maternal serum do not appear to be affected in IVF conception. We suggest that FF is an independent factor compared with IVF parameters.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technology (art)cell free dnaintracytoplasmic sperm injection (icsi)in vitro fertilization (ivf)nipt

Identifiers

PMID35651460
PMCPMC9136190
OpenAlexW4224942906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.