ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Comparison of the Results of a Parkinson's Holter Monitor With Patient Diaries, in Real Conditions of Use: A Sub-analysis of the MoMoPa-EC Clinical Trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04176302 (Monitoring of Mobility of Parkinson's Patients for Therapeutic Purposes - Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Monitoring of Mobility of Parkinson's Patients for Therapeutic Purposes - Clinical Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parkinson's disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical measures of motor function with a Holter monitor in Parkinson's disease.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Improving Parkinson's disease management through wearable technology: A cost-benefit perspective.PloS one · 2025Article
- [Commercial devices for monitoring symptoms in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations and trends].Revista de neurologia · 2024Review
- Commercial symptom monitoring devices in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations, and trends.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Application of single wrist-wearable accelerometry for objective motor diary assessment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease: Is the Golden Standard Shiny Enough?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Feasibility of a wearable inertial sensor to assess motor complications and treatment in Parkinson's disease.PloS one · 2023Observational
- Holter STAT-ON™ against other tools for detecting MF in advanced Parkinson's disease: an observational study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For specialists in charge of Parkinson's disease (PD), one of the most time-consuming tasks of the consultations is the assessment of symptoms and motor fluctuations. This task is complex and is usually based on the information provided by the patients themselves, which in most cases is complex and biased. In recent times, different tools have appeared on the market that allow automatic ambulatory monitoring. The MoMoPa-EC clinical trial (NCT04176302) investigates the effect of one of these tools-Sense4Care's STAT-ON-can have on routine clinical practice. In this sub-analysis the agreement between the Hauser diaries and the STAT-ON sensor is analyzed. Methods: Eighty four patients from MoMoPa-EC cohort were included in this sub-analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated between the patient diary entries and the sensor data. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient of both methods was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.3-0.73) for the OFF time (%), 0.48 (95% CI: 0.17-0.68) for the time in ON (%), and 0.65 (95% CI%: 0.44-0.78) for the time with dyskinesias (%). Furthermore, the Spearman correlations with the UPDRS scale have been analyzed for different parameters of the two methods. The maximum correlation found was -0.63 ( Conclusion: This sub-analysis shows a moderate concordance between the two tools, it is clearly appreciated that the correlation between the different UPDRS indices is better with the STAT-ON than with the Hauser diary. Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04176302 (NCT04176302).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.