Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650714›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2023

Traditional Chinese medicines and capecitabine-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer treatment: A meta-analysis.

Hui-Zhong Jiang, Ya-Li Jiang, Bing Yang, Feng-Xi Long, Zhu Yang, Dong-Xin Tang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chinese herbal medicines · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Molecular Mechanism ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui-Zhong JiangCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1888-3131
Ya-Li JiangCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.
Bing YangCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.
Feng-Xi LongCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.
Zhu YangCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.
Dong-Xin TangCollege of Graduate, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang, China.
Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCMs) to capecitabine-based regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) in term of tumor. The eight electronic databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Excerpt Medica Database (Embase), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journals (CQVIP), and Wanfang Database were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception to March 2021. Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials were involved in this study, and all the data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 (Nordic Cochran Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and R 4.0.5 software. The meta-analyses suggested that TCMs in combination with capecitabine-based regimens increased objective response rate (ORR) in the palliative treatment of CRC (risk ratio [RR], 1.35 [1.17, 1.55], I

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDrugs, Chinese HerbalNeutropeniaCapecitabineHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCapecitabineDrugs, Chinese Herbalcapecitabinecolorectal cancermeta-analysistraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID35650714
PMCPMC9844598
OpenAlexW4281614350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.