ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2022
Factors associated with decision-making power on family planning utilization among HIV-positive women attending public health facilities in Eastern Ethiopia.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, attitude, practices and associated factors of family planning among women living with hiv at the university of Gondar specialized hospital: a cross sectional study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Prevalence of married women's decision-making autonomy on contraceptive use and its associated factors in high fertility regions of Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis using EDHS 2016 data.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Women's decisions regarding family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-01-13Duplication of/in Article · Euphemisms for Duplication ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily planning for HIV-positive women has numerous advantages. However, the need of family planning utilization is challenged by women's nonautonomous decision-making power. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the level and associated factors of decision-making power to utilize family planning among HIV-positive married women.
methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2020 among 363 HIV-positive married women on ART, using systematic random sampling technique. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables that affect women's decision-making power on family planning utilization. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05 with 95% confidence interval and strength of association was reported by adjusted odds ratio.
resultsOverall 55.2% (95% CI: 49.9-60.5) of the women had decision-making power on family planning utilization. Women's having good knowledge (AOR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.52-5.40), favorable attitude (AOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13-3.38), women's getting family planning counseling in ART clinics (AOR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.16-3.59), women who get integration service of FP and ART (AOR: 1.83, 95% CI:1.07-3.12) were factors independently associated with women decision-making power on family planning utilization.
conclusionDecision-making power to utilize family planning among married HIV-positive women was low. Factors like poor knowledge about family planning, dissatisfaction with family planning service, not getting counseling about family planning in ART clinics, and not receiving family planning service in ART clinics were independently associated with women's decision-making power on family planning. Infrastructure linked with the health facility, knowledge, and attitudinal factors should all be combined in future family planning programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.