Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650637›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2022

Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis.

Patnarin Pongkulkiat, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Ajanee Mahakkanukrauh, Siraphop Suwannaroj, Chingching Foocharoen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patnarin PongkulkiatDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Bandit ThinkhamropDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Ajanee MahakkanukrauhDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Siraphop SuwannarojDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Chingching FoocharoenDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. fching@kku.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-4389
Khon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gold standard for skin thickness assessment in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS); however, inter- and intra-rater variation can arise due to subjective methods and inexperience. The study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater variability of mRSS assessment using a skin model.

methodsA comparative study was conducted between January and December 2020 at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Thirty-six skin sites of 8 SSc patients underwent mRSS assessment: 4 times the first day and 1 time over the next 4 weeks by the same 10 raters. No skin model for mRSS assessment was used for the first two assessments, while one was used for the remaining three rounds of assessments. The Latin square design and Kappa statistic were used to determine inter- and intra-rater variability.

resultsThe kappa agreement for inter-rater variability improved when the skin model was used (from 0.4 to 0.5; 25%). The improvement in inter-rater variability was seen in the non-expert group, for which the kappa agreement rose from 0.3 to 0.5 (a change of 66.7%). Intra-rater variability did not change (kappa remained at 0.9), and the long-term effect of using a skin model slightly decreased by week 4 (Δkappa 0.9-0.7).

conclusionsUsing a skin model could be used to improve inter-rater variation in mRSS assessment, especially in the non-expert group. The model should be considered a reference for mRSS assessment in clinical practice and health education.

Indexed as

Clinical trials and methodsPrimary care rheumatologyScleroderma and related disordersSkinStudy design

Identifiers

PMID35650637
PMCPMC9161481
OpenAlexW4281633269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.